Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25831521›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Sexual selection drives evolution and rapid turnover of male gene expression.

Peter W Harrison, Alison E Wright, Fabian Zimmer, Rebecca Dean, Stephen H Montgomery, Marie A Pointer, Judith E Mank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The molecular evolution of vertebrate organs.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Organization and evolution of sex-biased gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex-biased duplicates are rapidly generated duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter W HarrisonDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom p.w.harrison@ucl.ac.uk.
Alison E WrightDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Fabian ZimmerDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Rebecca DeanDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Stephen H MontgomeryDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Marie A PointerDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900747Medical Research Council G0900747 91070Wellcome Trust 090532/Z09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The profound and pervasive differences in gene expression observed between males and females, and the unique evolutionary properties of these genes in many species, have led to the widespread assumption that they are the product of sexual selection and sexual conflict. However, we still lack a clear understanding of the connection between sexual selection and transcriptional dimorphism, often termed sex-biased gene expression. Moreover, the relative contribution of sexual selection vs. drift in shaping broad patterns of expression, divergence, and polymorphism remains unknown. To assess the role of sexual selection in shaping these patterns, we assembled transcriptomes from an avian clade representing the full range of sexual dimorphism and sexual selection. We use these species to test the links between sexual selection and sex-biased gene expression evolution in a comparative framework. Through ancestral reconstruction of sex bias, we demonstrate a rapid turnover of sex bias across this clade driven by sexual selection and show it to be primarily the result of expression changes in males. We use phylogenetically controlled comparative methods to demonstrate that phenotypic measures of sexual selection predict the proportion of male-biased but not female-biased gene expression. Although male-biased genes show elevated rates of coding sequence evolution, consistent with previous reports in a range of taxa, there is no association between sexual selection and rates of coding sequence evolution, suggesting that expression changes may be more important than coding sequence in sexual selection. Taken together, our results highlight the power of sexual selection to act on gene expression differences and shape genome evolution.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAnimalsCluster AnalysisFemaleGalliformesGeeseGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGonadsLikelihood FunctionsMalePhylogenySex FactorsSpleenTranscription, Geneticgene expression evolutionsex-biased gene expressionsexual conflictsexual dimorphismsperm competition

Identifiers

PMID25831521
PMCPMC4394296
OpenAlexW2118235054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.