Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25831483›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2015

"It's got to be on this page": age and cognitive style in a study of online health information seeking.

Emily M Agree, Abby C King, Cynthia M Castro, Adrienne Wiley, Dina L G Borzekowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global online interest in finasteride sexual side effects.International journal of impotence research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Relationship between Health Literacy and Comfort with Teleneuropsychology in a Veteran Sample.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily M AgreeJohns Hopkins University, Departments of Sociology and Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. emily.agree@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-4055

Funding

Research Infrastructure for the Hopkins Population CenterR24HD042854 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAO, LINGXIN · 2003 to 2017
$5.1M
The Online Health Literacy of Older AdultsR01AG026430 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BORZEKOWSKI, DINA L · 2007 to 2009
$1.0M
Hopkins Center for Population Aging and HealthP30AG034460 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AGREE, EMILY M · 2009 to 2010
$302k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034460NIA NIH HHS P30AG34460NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026430NIA NIH HHS R01AG026430NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042854NICHD NIH HHS R24HD042854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe extensive availability of online health information offers the public opportunities to become independently informed about their care, but what affects the successful retrieval and understanding of accurate and detailed information? We have limited knowledge about the ways individuals use the Internet and the personal characteristics that affect online health literacy.

objectiveThis study examined the extent to which age and cognitive style predicted success in searching for online health information, controlling for differences in education, daily Internet use, and general health literacy.

methodsThe Online Health Study (OHS) was conducted at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and Stanford University School of Medicine from April 2009 to June 2010. The OHS was designed to explore the factors associated with success in obtaining health information across different age groups. A total of 346 men and women aged 35 years and older of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds participated in the study. Participants were evaluated for success in searching online for answers to health-related tasks/questions on nutrition, cancer, alternative medicine, vaccinations, medical equipment, and genetic testing.

resultsCognitive style, in terms of context sensitivity, was associated with less success in obtaining online health information, with tasks involving visual judgment most affected. In addition, better health literacy was positively associated with overall success in online health seeking, specifically for tasks requiring prior health knowledge. The oldest searchers were disadvantaged even after controlling for education, Internet use, general health literacy, and cognitive style, especially when spatial tasks such as mapping were involved.

conclusionsThe increasing availability of online health information provides opportunities to improve patient education and knowledge, but effective use of these resources depends on online health literacy. Greater support for those who are in the oldest cohorts and for design of interfaces that support users with different cognitive styles may be required in an age of shared medical decision making.

Indexed as

CognitionInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle Agedage groupseHealthfield dependence-independencehealth literacyInternet

Identifiers

PMID25831483
PMCPMC4389106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.