Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25830224›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative effectiveness of tocilizumab with either methotrexate or leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Javier Narváez, César Díaz-Torné, Berta Magallares, Maria Victoria Hernández, Delia Reina, Héctor Corominas, Raimon Sanmartí, Arturo Rodriguez de la Serna, Josep Maria Llobet, Joan M Nolla

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tocilizumab treatment in Felty's syndrome.Rheumatology international · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Javier NarváezDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
César Díaz-TornéRheumatology Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Berta MagallaresRheumatology Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Victoria HernándezDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Delia ReinaDeparment of Rheumatology, Hospital de Sant Joan Despí, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain.
Héctor CorominasDeparment of Rheumatology, Hospital de Sant Joan Despí, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain.
Raimon SanmartíDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Arturo Rodriguez de la SernaRheumatology Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Maria LlobetRheumatology Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan M NollaDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn agreement with EULAR recommendations, a DMARD in combination with a biotherapy is the reference treatment because of the superior long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of combination therapy but is in some cases contra-indicated or poorly tolerated. This observational study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of TCZ in combination with either MTX or leflunomide (LEF) in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to one or more DMARDs and/or biological agents in a real-world setting.

methodsWe performed an ambispective review of 91 patients with active RA who were routinely treated with TCZ plus MTX or LEF. A comparative study between the two combinations of treatment was performed at 6 months of follow-up considering 3 outcomes: improvement of RA disease activity, evolution of functional disability, and tolerability and side effect profile.

resultsOf the 91 patients, 62 received TCZ with MTX and 29 received TCZ with LEF. Eighty-one patients were followed for 6 months, and the remaining 10 patients discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the main clinical and laboratory data or in the number of previous DMARDs and biological agents used. At 6 months, there were no significant differences between the combinations in terms of disease activity and functional disability. Serious adverse events occurred in 11% and 10% of the patients treated in combination with MTX and LEF, respectively.

conclusionOur preliminary data support the argument that LEF is an effective and safe (equivalent) alternative to MTX for combination treatment with TCZ.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIsoxazolesLeflunomideMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedNeutropeniaRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsIsoxazolesLeflunomideMethotrexatetocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID25830224
PMCPMC4382296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.