Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25830119›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2015

The effect of intra-articular meperidine and bupivacaine 0.5% on postoperative pain of arthroscopic knee surgery; a randomized double blind clinical trial.

Farnad Imani, Saeidreza Entezary, Mohammad Razi, Ali Akbar Jafarian, Fardin Yousefshahi, Hasan Etemadi, Saeid Safari

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic Challenges for Knee Osteoarthritis.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farnad ImaniPain Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rasoul Akram Medical Center,, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeidreza EntezaryDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rasoul Akram Medical Center,, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad RaziDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Rasoul Akram Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Akbar JafarianDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rasoul Akram Medical Center,, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fardin YousefshahiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Hasan EtemadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hazrat Fatemeh Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeid SafariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rasoul Akram Medical Center,, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArthroscopic knee surgeries have a painful postoperative course, which often necessitates acute pain management. Among different analgesia techniques, Intra-articular injection is the technique of choice for many pain specialists, based on its confined effect to the surgical site (knee), lack of systemic effects and promotion of safe early ambulation.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare analgesic effects of intra-articular meperidine, bupivacaine 0.5% or their combination after knee arthroscopic surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixty ASA class I-II patients' candidates for arthroscopy knee surgery enrolled in a randomized double blind study to receive either 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5%; 100 mg meperidine (diluted in normal saline) or bupivacaine 0.5% along with 100 mg meperidine. A written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Postoperative analgesia duration, VAS at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours, the first analgesic request time, total fentanyl consumption in first 24 hours, patients' satisfaction and adverse effects were recorded.

resultsThe bupivacaine-meperidine group had better duration of postoperative analgesia (P = 0.001), latter first analgesic request (P ≤ 0.001), lower total fentanyl consumption in first 24 hours after the operation (P = 0.001), less mean VAS at 2 hours (P = 0.001) and more patients' overall satisfaction (P = 0.01) compared with each medication alone. VAS at 6, 12 and 24 postoperative hours were not different between the groups of study. No adverse effects were observed.

conclusionsAlthough postoperative intra-articular meperidine is a better alternative for bupivacaine, their combination could improve their analgesic effects compared with each other alone.

Indexed as

BupivacaineIntra-Articular InjectionMeperidinePain

Identifiers

PMID25830119
PMCPMC4363738
OpenAlexW2113859438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.