Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25829560›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2015

Antimicrobial resistance trends among canine Escherichia coli isolates obtained from clinical samples in the northeastern USA, 2004-2011.

Kevin J Cummings, Victor A Aprea, Craig Altier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial-ResistantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pet and Stray Dogs as Reservoirs of Antimicrobial-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antibiotic-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin J CummingsDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA (Cummings); Wicked Device LLC, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA (Aprea); Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA (Altier).
Victor A ApreaDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA (Cummings); Wicked Device LLC, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA (Aprea); Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA (Altier).
Craig AltierDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA (Cummings); Wicked Device LLC, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA (Aprea); Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA (Altier).
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objectives were to describe the antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dogs in the northeastern USA and to identify temporal trends in resistance to selected antimicrobial agents. Data were collected retrospectively for all canine E. coli isolates from clinical samples submitted to Cornell University's Animal Health Diagnostic Center between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2011. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on 3519 canine E. coli isolates; frequency of resistance to each agent ranged from 0.4% (amikacin) to 34.3% (ampicillin). No trends were evident among urinary isolates, but cephalosporin resistance remained consistently high. Among non-urinary isolates, there was evidence of a significantly increasing trend in prevalence of resistance to several agents, including cephalosporins, enrofloxacin, and tetracycline. These data suggest that some of the most commonly used antimicrobial agents in companion animal practice are becoming less effective against canine E. coli infections outside the urinary tract.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsDog DiseasesDogsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnrofloxacinEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFluoroquinolonesLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisNew EnglandTetracyclineTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsEnrofloxacinFluoroquinolonesTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID25829560
PMCPMC4357913
OpenAlexW211965481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.