ArticleBMJ open2015
National Audit of Seizure management in Hospitals (NASH): results of the national audit of adult epilepsy in the UK.
Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Assessing Treatment Fidelity within an Epilepsy Randomized Controlled Trial: Seizure First Aid Training for People with Epilepsy Who Visit Emergency Departments.Behavioural neurology · 2019Trial
- People with epilepsy obtain added value from education in groups: results of a qualitative study.European journal of neurology · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Causes and prognosis of adults experiencing a first seizure in adulthood: A pilot cohort study conducted in five countries in Latin America.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
- Case-control study developing Scottish Epilepsy Deaths Study Score to predict epilepsy-related death.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Non-1st seizure was less severe than 1st seizure with non-urgent level among suspected seizures transferred by ambulance.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Care in Europe after presenting to the emergency department with a seizure; position paper and insights from the European Audit of Seizure Management in Hospitals.European journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Article
- A data linkage study of suspected seizures in the urgent and emergency care system in the UK.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2020Article
- Patient views on use of emergency and alternative care services for adult epilepsy: A qualitative study.Seizure · 2020Article
- Computed tomography in patients with epileptic seizures admitted acutely to hospital: A population level analysis of routinely collected healthcare data.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- The Walton Centre neurology network - an equitable, sustainable and deliverable model for a large-scale neurology service.Future healthcare journal · 2019Article
- Emergency hospital care for adults with suspected seizures in the NHS in England 2007-2013: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Article
- Digital Care in Epilepsy: A Conceptual Framework for Technological Therapies.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2).BMJ open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAbout 100,000 people present to hospitals each year in England with an epileptic seizure. How they are managed is unknown; thus, the National Audit of Seizure management in Hospitals (NASH) set out to assess prior care, management of the acute event and follow-up of these patients. This paper describes the data from the second audit conducted in 2013.
setting154 emergency departments (EDs) across the UK.
participantsData from 4544 attendances (median age of 45 years, 57% men) showed that 61% had a prior diagnosis of epilepsy, 12% other neurological problems and 22% were first seizure cases. Each ED identified 30 consecutive adult cases presenting due to a seizure. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Details were recorded of the patient's prior care, management at hospital and onward referral to neurological specialists onto an online database. Descriptive results are reported at national level.
resultsOf those with epilepsy, 498 (18%) were on no antiepileptic drug therapy and 1330 (48%) were on monotherapy. Assessments were often incomplete and witness histories were sought in only 759 (75%) of first seizure patients, 58% were seen by a senior doctor and 57% were admitted. For first seizure patients, advice on further seizure management was given to 264 (27%) and only 55% were referred to a neurologist or epilepsy specialist. For each variable, there was wide variability among sites that was not explicable. For the sites who partook in both audits, there was a trend towards better care in 2013, but this was small and dwarfed by the intersite variability.
conclusionsThese results have parallels with the Sentinel Audit of Stroke performed a decade earlier. There is wide intersite variability in care covering the entire care pathway, and a need for better organised and accessible care for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.