ArticlePsychosomatic medicine2015
Can exaggerated stress reactivity and prolonged recovery predict negative health outcomes? The case of cardiovascular disease.
Article in Psychosomatic medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Salivary uric acid dynamics are associated with stress response hormones among African Americans in an urban sample.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024Article
- Category-Specific Stress Mindsets: Beliefs about the Debilitating versus Enhancing Effects of Specific Types of Stressors among Young Adults.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Computing Components of Everyday Stress Responses: Exploring Conceptual Challenges and New Opportunities.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Adverse childhood experiences and perceived stress in early adulthood in the context of disadvantage.Child abuse & neglect · 2022Article
- Childhood Trauma and Cortisol Reactivity: An Investigation of the Role of Task Appraisals.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Maternal Mental Health and Parenting Stress and Their Relationships to Characteristics of the Child With Fragile X Syndrome.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Salivary uric acid: Associations with resting and reactive blood pressure response to social evaluative stress in healthy African Americans.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2019Article
- Distinct effects of early-life experience and trait aggression on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery.Physiology & behavior · 2019Article
- Autonomic reactivity and vulnerability to depression: A multi-wave study.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2017Article
- Heritability of heart rate recovery and vagal rebound after exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Researchers and laypersons have long argued that stress is bad for health, particularly when responses are large, prolonged, and frequent. By extension, individuals who have the largest and the most prolonged responses are assumed to have worse outcomes than do less reactive persons. Research in animals has been supportive of the connection between stress and poor health, but evidence in humans has been slow to accumulate. The current issue of Psychosomatic Medicine presents a meta-analysis of 33 studies of delayed recovery from stress and its association with poor cardiovascular disease outcomes and all-cause mortality. The analysis supports the contention that slower recovery to baseline after exercise or psychological stress may predict earlier death due to all causes. This finding raises questions for psychosomatic theories of disease and points the direction for further study of how or whether to incorporate reactivity measures into standard risk profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.