Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25829229›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2015

Association of prior antiplatelet agents with mortality in sepsis patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Min-Juei Tsai, Shuo-Ming Ou, Chia-Jen Shih, Pei-Wen Chao, Lan-Fu Wang, Yu-Ning Shih, Szu-Yuan Li, Shu-Chen Kuo, Yen-Tao Hsu, Yung-Tai Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Intracellular communication and immunothrombosis in sepsis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Min-Juei TsaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Suao Branch, Yilan, Taiwan.
Shuo-Ming Ou
Chia-Jen Shih
Pei-Wen Chao
Lan-Fu Wang
Yu-Ning Shih
Szu-Yuan Li
Shu-Chen Kuo
Yen-Tao Hsu
Yung-Tai Chen
Taipei Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei City Hospital · TWChest Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWWan Fang Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiplatelet agents are widely used for cardiovascular disea ses, but their pleiotropic effects in sepsis are controversial.

objectiveTo investigate the association between antiplatelet agents and the survival benefit for sepsis patients.

designA nationwide population-based cohort and nested case-control study.

settingTaiwan National Health Insurance database.

participantsAll patients (age ≥18 years) who were hospitalized for sepsis between January 2000 and December 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Conditional logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding. Adjusted odd ratios (ORs) were used to compare the mortality rate due to sepsis in antiplatelet drug users and nonusers.

resultsOf 683,421 included patients, 229,792 (33.6 %) patients died during hospitalization for sepsis, and the rest (64.4 %) survived to discharge. Use of antiplatelet agents before admission was associated with a lower risk of mortality in sepsis patients (aOR 0.82, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.83, P < 0.001). By using another case-control study design, the beneficial effect was more significant in current users (aOR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.76-0.79) than in recent users (aOR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.85-0.91), but was not significant in past users (aOR 1.00, 95 % CI 0.98-1.02). LIMITATIONS: Observational study.

conclusionsPrior use of antiplatelet agents was associated with a survival benefit in sepsis patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRisk FactorsSepsisTaiwanPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25829229
OpenAlexW2169605579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.