Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2582896›Full record

ArticleChromosoma1989

DNA loop domains in mammalian spermatozoa.

W S Ward, A W Partin, D S Coffey

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Functional Aspects of Sperm Chromatin Organization.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022
    Review
  3. Organization of sperm DNA by the nuclear matrix.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Breaking news" from spermatids.Basic and clinical andrology · 2013
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The sperm nucleus: chromatin, RNA, and the nuclear matrix.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2011
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Decondensing the protamine domain for transcription.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W S WardDepartment of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
A W Partin
D S Coffey

Funding

Urology Research Training GrantT32DK007552 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COFFEY, DONALD STRALEY · 1987 to 2012
$2.9M
THE NUCLEAR MATRIX IN ANDROGEN-REGULATED PROSTATE GROWTHR01DK022000 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COFFEY, DONALD STRALEY · 1986 to 2001
$602k
ANDROGEN REGULATION OF DNA ORGANIZATION IN THE PROSTATER37DK022000 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COFFEY, DONALD STRALEY · 1988 to 1995
–
NIDDK NIH HHS DK07552NIDDK NIH HHS DK22000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The highly condensed and tightly packaged DNA of hamster spermatozoa was found to be organized into topologically constrained DNA loop domains attached at their bases to a nuclear matrix. The loop domains of the sperm nuclei differed from somatic cell loop domains from the same animal in two aspects. Sperm loop domains were 60% smaller than somatic cell loop domains, with an average DNA length of 46 +/- 7 kb in sperm as compared with 76 +/- 11 kb in brain. Secondly, unlike virtually all somatic cell DNA known which is negatively supercoiled, sperm DNA was devoid of detectable supercoiling. The presence of the loop domain structure in the highly condensed DNA of mammalian spermatozoa suggests that this motif is a fundamental aspect of eukaryotic DNA organization.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain ChemistryCell NucleusCricetinaeDNAMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceNucleic Acid ConformationSpermatozoaDNA

Identifiers

PMID2582896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.