Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25828800›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2015

Spinal antinociceptive effects of the novel NOP receptor agonist PWT2-nociceptin/orphanin FQ in mice and monkeys.

A Rizzi, D D Sukhtankar, H Ding, K Hayashida, C Ruzza, R Guerrini, G Calò, M C Ko

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Effects of NOP-Related Ligands in Nonhuman Primates.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  10. ORLJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Central N/OFQ-NOP Receptor System in Pain Modulation.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A RizziDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Pharmacology and National Institute of Neuroscience, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
D D SukhtankarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
H DingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
K HayashidaDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and LTTA, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
C RuzzaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Pharmacology and National Institute of Neuroscience, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
R GuerriniDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
G CalòDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Pharmacology and National Institute of Neuroscience, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
M C KoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
University of Ferrara · ITWake Forest University · US

Funding

Pharmacological Studies of NOP ReceptorsR01DA032568 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KO, MEI-CHUAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Behavioral Pharmacology of ItchR01AR059193 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KO, MEI-CHUAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059193NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR059193NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032568NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA032568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeUsing an innovative chemical approach, peptide welding technology (PWT), a tetrabranched derivative of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) has been generated and pharmacologically characterized. Both in vitro and in vivo PWT2-N/OFQ displayed the same pharmacological profile to the natural ligand. It was more potent and produced longer-lasting effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate the spinal effects of PWT2-N/OFQ in nociceptive and neuropathic pain models in mice and non-human primates. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Tail withdrawal assay in mice and monkeys was used as a nociceptive pain model and mechanical threshold in mice subjected to chronic constriction injury was used as a neuropathic pain model. The antinociceptive effects of spinally administered N/OFQ and PWT2-N/OFQ were assessed in these models. KEY

resultsPWT2-N/OFQ mimicked the spinal antinociceptive effects of N/OFQ both in nociceptive and neuropathic pain models in mice as well as in non-human primates displaying 40-fold higher potency and a markedly prolonged duration of action. The effects of N/OFQ and PWT2-N/OFQ were sensitive to the N/OFQ receptor (NOP) antagonist SB-612111, but not to opioid receptor antagonists. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present study has demonstrated that PWT2-N/OFQ mimicked the antinociceptive effects of the natural peptide in rodents and non-human primates acting as a potent and longer-lasting NOP-selective agonist. More generally, PWT derivatives of biologically active peptides can be viewed as innovative pharmacological tools for investigating those conditions and states in which selective and prolonged receptor stimulation promotes beneficial effects.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsCycloheptanesDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleMiceNarcotic AntagonistsNociceptinNociceptin ReceptorOpioid PeptidesPiperidinesReceptors, OpioidSpinal NervesAnalgesicscis-1-methyl-7-((4-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)piperidin-1-yl)methyl)-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-benzocyclohepten-5-olCycloheptanesNarcotic AntagonistsNociceptinNociceptin ReceptorOpioid PeptidesPiperidinesPWT2 nociceptinReceptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID25828800
PMCPMC4507167
OpenAlexW2119094975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.