ArticleScientific reports2015
A hybrid chimeric system for versatile and ultra-sensitive RNase detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sample Buffer Containing Guanidine-Hydrochloride Combines Biological Safety and RNA Preservation for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ribonuclease-Responsive DNA Nanoswitches.Cell reports. Physical science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a new versatile strategy that allows the detection of several classes of RNases (i.e., targeting ss- or ds-RNA, DNA/RNA hetero-hybrid or junctions) with higher sensitivity than existing assays. Our two-step approach consists of a DNA-RNA-DNA chimeric Hairpin Probe (cHP) conjugated to magnetic microparticles and containing a DNAzyme sequence in its terminal region, and molecular beacons for fluorescence signal generation. In the first step, the digestion of the RNA portion of the cHP sequences in presence of RNases leads to the release of multiple copies of the DNAzyme in solution. Then, after magnetic washing, each DNAzyme molecule elicits the catalytic cleavage of numerous molecular beacons, providing a strong amplification of the overall sensitivity of the assay. We successfully applied our approach to detect very low concentrations of RNase A, E. coli RNase I, and RNase H. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of two antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) on RNase H activity, demonstrating the applicability of our strategy for the screening of inhibitors. Finally, we exploited our system to detect RNase activity directly in crude biological samples (i.e., blood and saliva) and in cell culture medium, highlighting its suitability as cheap and sensitive tool for the detection of RNase levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.