Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25828633›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2015

Optimal treatment scheduling of ionizing radiation and sunitinib improves the antitumor activity and allows dose reduction.

Esther A Kleibeuker, Matthijs A Ten Hooven, Kitty C Castricum, Richard Honeywell, Arjan W Griffioen, Henk M Verheul, Ben J Slotman, Victor L Thijssen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Interfering with Tumor Hypoxia for Radiotherapy Optimization.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Novel treatment planning approaches to enhance the therapeutic ratio: targeting the molecular mechanisms of radiation therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esther A KleibeukerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthijs A Ten HoovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kitty C CastricumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Richard HoneywellDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan W GriffioenDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk M VerheulDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ben J SlotmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Victor L ThijssenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6146-1842
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of radiotherapy with sunitinib is clinically hampered by rare but severe side effects and varying results with respect to clinical benefit. We studied different scheduling regimes and dose reduction in sunitinib and radiotherapy in preclinical tumor models to improve potential outcome of this combination treatment strategy. The chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) was used as an angiogenesis in vivo model and as a xenograft model with human tumor cells (HT29 colorectal adenocarcinoma, OE19 esophageal adenocarcinoma). Treatment consisted of ionizing radiation (IR) and sunitinib as single therapy or in combination, using different dose-scheduling regimes. Sunitinib potentiated the inhibitory effect of IR (4 Gy) on angiogenesis. In addition, IR (4 Gy) and sunitinib (4 days of 32.5 mg/kg per day) inhibited tumor growth. Ionizing radiation induced tumor cell apoptosis and reduced proliferation, whereas sunitinib decreased tumor angiogenesis and reduced tumor cell proliferation. When IR was applied before sunitinib, this almost completely inhibited tumor growth, whereas concurrent IR was less effective and IR after sunitinib had no additional effect on tumor growth. Moreover, optimal scheduling allowed a 50% dose reduction in sunitinib while maintaining comparable antitumor effects. This study shows that the therapeutic efficacy of combination therapy improves when proper dose-scheduling is applied. More importantly, optimal treatment regimes permit dose reductions in the angiogenesis inhibitor, which will likely reduce the side effects of combination therapy in the clinical setting. Our study provides important leads to optimize combination treatment in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDisease Models, AnimalHumansIndolesNeovascularization, PathologicPyrrolesRadiation DosageSunitinibAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsIndolesPyrrolesSunitinibAngiogenesiscombination therapypreclinical tumor modelradiotherapysunitinib

Identifiers

PMID25828633
PMCPMC4529339
OpenAlexW2018640022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.