ReviewPediatric radiology2015
Normal perinatal and paediatric postmortem magnetic resonance imaging appearances.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardised structured fetal and neonatal postmortem magnetic resonance imaging reporting: recommendations from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Postmortem Task Force.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Implementation of pediatric and fetal postmortem imaging into clinical practice: a multi-society statement from the ESPR, SPR, SLARP, AOSPR, WFPI, and IAFR.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Differentiating ante-mortem from post-mortem findings on fetal and pediatric post-mortem imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Fetal and neonatal postmortem magnetic resonance imaging: indications protocols.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Review
- Added value of postmortem mri in sudden unexpected infant death cases.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- Fetal and neonatal post-mortem imaging referral template: recommendations from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Post-mortem Task Force.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Imaging of sudden unexpected death in infancy: a comprehensive nationwide French survey.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Essence of postmortem computed tomography for in-hospital deaths: what clinical radiologists should know.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Fetal brain maceration score on postmortem magnetic resonance imaging vs. conventional autopsy.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Pictorial review of the postmortem computed tomography in neonaticide cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Review
- A pragmatic evidence-based approach to post-mortem perinatal imaging.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- MRI signs of intrauterine fetal demise.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Review
- Navigating the perils and pitfalls of pediatric forensic postmortem imaging in the United States.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Visualisation of fetal meconium on post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging scans: a retrospective observational study.Acta radiologica open · 2020Article
- Maceration determines diagnostic yield of fetal and neonatal whole body post-mortem ultrasound.Prenatal diagnosis · 2020Article
- Perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): radiological-pathological correlation.Insights into imaging · 2019Review
- Diagnostic assessment of foetal brain malformations with intra-uterine MRI versus perinatal post-mortem MRI.Neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Pediatric postmortem computed tomography: initial experience at a children's hospital in the United States.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As postmortem imaging becomes more widely used following perinatal and paediatric deaths, the correct interpretation of images becomes imperative, particularly given the increased use of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging. Many pathological processes may have similar appearances in life and following death. A thorough knowledge of normal postmortem changes is therefore required within postmortem magnetic resonance imaging to ensure that these are not mistakenly interpreted as significant pathology. Similarly, some changes that are interpreted as pathological if they occur during life may be artefacts on postmortem magnetic resonance imaging that are of limited significance. This review serves to illustrate briefly those postmortem magnetic resonance imaging changes as part of the normal changes after death in fetuses and children, and highlight imaging findings that may confuse or mislead an observer to identifying pathology where none is present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.