Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25827927›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2015

Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Crystal T Engineer, Kimiya C Rahebi, Elizabeth P Buell, Melyssa K Fink, Michael P Kilgard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mice can learn phonetic categories.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Article
  7. A Hierarchy of Time Scales for Discriminating and Classifying the Temporal Shape of Sound in Three Auditory Cortical Fields.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  8. Shank3-deficient rats exhibit degraded cortical responses to sound.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Crystal T EngineerSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080, United States. Electronic address: novitski@utdallas.edu.
Kimiya C RahebiSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080, United States.
Elizabeth P BuellSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080, United States.
Melyssa K FinkSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080, United States.
Michael P KilgardSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080, United States.

Funding

Animal Model of Speech Sound Processing in AutismR01DC010433 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KILGARD, MICHAEL P · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010433NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC010433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech sounds evoke unique neural activity patterns in primary auditory cortex (A1). Extensive speech sound discrimination training alters A1 responses. While the neighboring auditory cortical fields each contain information about speech sound identity, each field processes speech sounds differently. We hypothesized that while all fields would exhibit training-induced plasticity following speech training, there would be unique differences in how each field changes. In this study, rats were trained to discriminate speech sounds by consonant or vowel in quiet and in varying levels of background speech-shaped noise. Local field potential and multiunit responses were recorded from four auditory cortex fields in rats that had received 10 weeks of speech discrimination training. Our results reveal that training alters speech evoked responses in each of the auditory fields tested. The neural response to consonants was significantly stronger in anterior auditory field (AAF) and A1 following speech training. The neural response to vowels following speech training was significantly weaker in ventral auditory field (VAF) and posterior auditory field (PAF). This differential plasticity of consonant and vowel sound responses may result from the greater paired pulse depression, expanded low frequency tuning, reduced frequency selectivity, and lower tone thresholds, which occurred across the four auditory fields. These findings suggest that alterations in the distributed processing of behaviorally relevant sounds may contribute to robust speech discrimination.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexDiscrimination, PsychologicalEvoked Potentials, AuditoryPhoneticsRatsSpeech PerceptionAuditory processingMap reorganizationReceptive field plasticitySpeech therapy

Identifiers

PMID25827927
PMCPMC4424170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.