Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25827656›Full record

Trial reportArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2015

Health behavior change counseling in surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: patient activation mediates the effects of health behavior change counseling on rehabilitation engagement.

Richard L Skolasky, Anica M Maggard, David Li, Lee H Riley, Stephen T Wegener

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard L SkolaskyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: editorialservices@jhmi.edu.
Anica M MaggardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
David LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Lee H RileyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Stephen T WegenerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Functional recovery in lumbar spine surgery: Influence of a brief Health BehaviorR01HS017990 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SKOLASKY, RICHARD L. · 2009 to 2012
$971k
AHRQ HHS 1 R01HS 017990AHRQ HHS R01 HS017990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of health behavior change counseling (HBCC) on patient activation and the influence of patient activation on rehabilitation engagement, and to identify common barriers to engagement among individuals undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

designProspective clinical trial.

settingAcademic medical center.

participantsConsecutive lumbar spine surgery patients (N=122) defined in our companion article (Part I) were assigned to a control group (did not receive HBCC, n=59) or HBCC group (received HBCC, n=63).

interventionBrief motivational interviewing-based HBCC versus control (significance, P<.05).

main outcome measuresWe assessed patient activation before and after intervention. Rehabilitation engagement was assessed using the physical therapist-reported Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale and by a ratio of self-reported physical therapy and home exercise completion. Common barriers to rehabilitation engagement were identified through thematic analysis.

resultsPatient activation predicted engagement (standardized regression weight, .682; P<.001). Postintervention patient activation was predicted by baseline patient activation (standardized regression weight, .808; P<.001) and receipt of HBCC (standardized regression weight, .444; P<.001). The effect of HBCC on rehabilitation engagement was mediated by patient activation (standardized regression weight, .079; P=.395). One-third of the HBCC group did not show improvement compared with the control group. Thematic analysis identified 3 common barriers to engagement: (1) low self-efficacy because of lack of knowledge and support (62%); (2) anxiety related to fear of movement (57%); and (3) concern about pain management (48%).

conclusionsThe influence of HBCC on rehabilitation engagement was mediated by patient activation. Despite improvements in patient activation, one-third of patients reported low rehabilitation engagement. Addressing these barriers should lead to greater improvements in rehabilitation engagement.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeMotivational InterviewingPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedCounselingDisability EvaluationExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth StatusHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedLaminectomyMotivational interviewingPatient participationRehabilitationSpinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID25827656
PMCPMC6153440
OpenAlexW1839072605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.