Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25827289›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2015

Diet quality in older age: the influence of childhood and adult socio-economic circumstances.

Janice L Atkins, Sheena E Ramsay, Peter H Whincup, Richard W Morris, Lucy T Lennon, S Goya Wannamethee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janice L AtkinsDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London Medical School,Royal Free Campus,LondonNW3 2PF,UK.
Sheena E RamsayDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London Medical School,Royal Free Campus,LondonNW3 2PF,UK.
Peter H WhincupDivision of Population Health Sciences and Education, Population Health Research Centre, St George's University of London,LondonSW17 0RE,UK.
Richard W MorrisDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London Medical School,Royal Free Campus,LondonNW3 2PF,UK.
Lucy T LennonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London Medical School,Royal Free Campus,LondonNW3 2PF,UK.
S Goya WannametheeDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London Medical School,Royal Free Campus,LondonNW3 2PF,UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/09/024/26857British Heart Foundation RG/08/013/25942British Heart Foundation RG/13/16/30528Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0501859Medical Research Council G1002391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socio-economic gradients in diet quality are well established. However, the influence of material socio-economic conditions particularly in childhood, and the use of multiple disaggregated socio-economic measures on diet quality have been little studied in the elderly. In the present study, we examined childhood and adult socio-economic measures, and social relationships, as determinants of diet quality cross-sectionally in 4252 older British men (aged 60-79 years). A FFQ provided data on daily fruit and vegetable consumption and the Elderly Dietary Index (EDI), with higher scores indicating better diet quality. Adult and childhood socio-economic measures included occupation/father's occupation, education and household amenities, which combined to create composite scores. Social relationships included social contact, living arrangements and marital status. Both childhood and adult socio-economic factors were independently associated with diet quality. Compared with non-manual social class, men of childhood manual social class were less likely to consume fruit and vegetables daily (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66, 0.97), as were men of adult manual social class (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.54, 0.79), and less likely to be in the top EDI quartile (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61, 0.88), similar to men of adult manual social class (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.55, 0.79). Diet quality decreased with increasing adverse adult socio-economic scores; however, the association with adverse childhood socio-economic scores diminished with adult social class adjustment. A combined adverse childhood and adulthood socio-economic score was associated with poor diet quality. Diet quality was most favourable in married men and those not living alone, but was not associated with social contact. Diet quality in older men is influenced by childhood and adulthood socio-economic factors, marital status and living arrangements.

Indexed as

DietSocioeconomic FactorsAgedEducational StatusFathersFeeding BehaviorFood QualityFruitHumansMaleMarital StatusMiddle AgedNutritive ValueOccupationsProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsDiet qualityDiet scoreOlder adultsSocial relationshipsSocio-economic factors

Identifiers

PMID25827289
PMCPMC4462157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.