Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25826251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Diagnostic molecular markers for phosphine resistance in U.S. populations of Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica.

Zhaorigetu Chen, David Schlipalius, George Opit, Bhadriraju Subramanyam, Thomas W Phillips

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Toxics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhaorigetu ChenDepartment of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America; Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Center, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
David SchlipaliusDepartment of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Agri-Science Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Center, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
George OpitDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Bhadriraju SubramanyamDept. of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America; Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Center, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Thomas W PhillipsDepartment of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America; Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Center, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Kansas State University · USACT GovernmentOklahoma State University · USPlant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stored product beetles that are resistant to the fumigant pesticide phosphine (hydrogen phosphide) gas have been reported for more than 40 years in many places worldwide. Traditionally, determination of phosphine resistance in stored product beetles is based on a discriminating dose bioassay that can take up to two weeks to evaluate. We developed a diagnostic cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence method, CAPS, to detect individuals with alleles for strong resistance to phosphine in populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, and the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica, according to a single nucleotide mutation in the dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD) gene. We initially isolated and sequenced the DLD genes from susceptible and strongly resistant populations of both species. The corresponding amino acid sequences were then deduced. A single amino acid mutation in DLD in populations of T. castaneum and R. dominica with strong resistance was identified as P45S in T. castaneum and P49S in R. dominica, both collected from northern Oklahoma, USA. PCR products containing these mutations were digested by the restriction enzymes MboI and BstNI, which revealed presence or absence, respectively of the resistant (R) allele and allowed inference of genotypes with that allele. Seven populations of T. castaneum from Kansas were subjected to discriminating dose bioassays for the weak and strong resistance phenotypes. Application of CAPS to these seven populations confirmed the R allele was in high frequency in the strongly resistant populations, and was absent or at a lower frequency in populations with weak resistance, which suggests that these populations with a low frequency of the R allele have the potential for selection of the strong resistance phenotype. CAPS markers for strong phosphine resistance will help to detect and confirm resistant beetles and can facilitate resistance management actions against a given pest population.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersAllelesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsColeopteraDNA, ComplementaryGenotypeInsecticide ResistanceMolecular Sequence DataPhosphinesSequence Homology, Amino AcidTriboliumUnited StatesDNA, ComplementaryGenetic MarkersphosphinePhosphines

Identifiers

PMID25826251
PMCPMC4380312
OpenAlexW2086115126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.