Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825834›Full record

ArticleNature methods2015

Successful test launch for nanopore sequencing.

Nicholas J Loman, Mick Watson

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genome Editing and Protein Energy Malnutrition.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas J LomanInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mick WatsonThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, and Edinburgh Genomics, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211550Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211551Medical Research Council G0900740Medical Research Council MR/J014370/1Medical Research Council MR/K001744/1Medical Research Council MR/M501621/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

NanoporesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

PMID25825834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.