Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825777›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Candidate ionotropic taste receptors in the Drosophila larva.

Shannon Stewart, Tong-Wey Koh, Arpan C Ghosh, John R Carlson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms of gas sensing by internal sensory neurons inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Insects · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shannon StewartDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Tong-Wey KohDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Arpan C GhoshDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
John R CarlsonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511 john.carlson@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

ANALYSIS OF ODORANT RECEPTOR GENESR01DC004729 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John R Carlson · 2001 to 2026
$9.2M
GENETIC AND MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF OLFACTIONR01DC002174 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARLSON, JOHN R · 1994 to 2024
$8.0M
Analysis of a large family of taste receptorsR01DC011697 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John R Carlson · 2011 to 2026
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002174NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004729NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine in Drosophila a group of ∼35 ionotropic receptors (IRs), the IR20a clade, about which remarkably little is known. Of 28 genes analyzed, GAL4 drivers representing 11 showed expression in the larva. Eight drivers labeled neurons of the pharynx, a taste organ, and three labeled neurons of the body wall that may be chemosensory. Expression was not observed in neurons of one taste organ, the terminal organ, although these neurons express many drivers of the Gr (Gustatory receptor) family. For most drivers of the IR20a clade, we observed expression in a single pair of cells in the animal, with limited coexpression, and only a fraction of pharyngeal neurons are labeled. The organization of IR20a clade expression thus appears different from the organization of the Gr family or the Odor receptor (Or) family in the larva. A remarkable feature of the larval pharynx is that some of its organs are incorporated into the adult pharynx, and several drivers of this clade are expressed in the pharynx of both larvae and adults. Different IR drivers show different developmental dynamics across the larval stages, either increasing or decreasing. Among neurons expressing drivers in the pharynx, two projection patterns can be distinguished in the CNS. Neurons exhibiting these two kinds of projection patterns may activate different circuits, possibly signaling the presence of cues with different valence. Taken together, the simplest interpretation of our results is that the IR20a clade encodes a class of larval taste receptors.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsImmunohistochemistryLarvaNeuronsPharynxReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateSensory Receptor CellsTasteDrosophila ProteinsReceptors, Ionotropic Glutamateionotropic receptorslarvatastetaste receptors

Identifiers

PMID25825777
PMCPMC4394268
OpenAlexW1988379031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.