Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825766›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

The human sex ratio from conception to birth.

Steven Hecht Orzack, J William Stubblefield, Viatcheslav R Akmaev, Pere Colls, Santiago Munné, Thomas Scholl, David Steinsaltz, James E Zuckerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Temperature and sex ratios at birth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Effect of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Human Sex Ratios.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven Hecht OrzackFresh Pond Research Institute, Cambridge, MA 02140; orzack@freshpond.org.
J William StubblefieldFresh Pond Research Institute, Cambridge, MA 02140;
Viatcheslav R AkmaevGenzyme Genetics, Westborough, MA 01581;
Pere CollsReprogenetics, Livingston, NJ 07039;
Santiago MunnéReprogenetics, Livingston, NJ 07039;
Thomas SchollGenzyme Genetics, Westborough, MA 01581;
David SteinsaltzOxford University, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom; and.
James E ZuckermanHarvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

Funding

The demographic trajectory of the sex ratio in human pregnancyR03HD055685 · NICHD · FRESH POND RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ORZACK, STEVEN · 2008 to 2009
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD055685NICHD NIH HHS R03HD055685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the trajectory of the human sex ratio from conception to birth by analyzing data from (i) 3- to 6-d-old embryos, (ii) induced abortions, (iii) chorionic villus sampling, (iv) amniocentesis, and (v) fetal deaths and live births. Our dataset is the most comprehensive and largest ever assembled to estimate the sex ratio at conception and the sex ratio trajectory and is the first, to our knowledge, to include all of these types of data. Our estimate of the sex ratio at conception is 0.5 (proportion male), which contradicts the common claim that the sex ratio at conception is male-biased. The sex ratio among abnormal embryos is male-biased, and the sex ratio among normal embryos is female-biased. These biases are associated with the abnormal/normal state of the sex chromosomes and of chromosomes 15 and 17. The sex ratio may decrease in the first week or so after conception (due to excess male mortality); it then increases for at least 10-15 wk (due to excess female mortality), levels off after ∼20 wk, and declines slowly from 28 to 35 wk (due to excess male mortality). Total female mortality during pregnancy exceeds total male mortality. The unbiased sex ratio at conception, the increase in the sex ratio during the first trimester, and total mortality during pregnancy being greater for females are fundamental insights into early human development.

Indexed as

FertilizationParturitionSex RatioAbortion, InducedAge FactorsChorionic Villi SamplingEmbryo, MammalianFemaleHumansKaryotypingMalePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstReproductive Techniques, Assisteddemographydevelopmentevolutiongeneticssex ratio

Identifiers

PMID25825766
PMCPMC4413259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.