Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825743›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Tectal microcircuit generating visual selection commands on gaze-controlling neurons.

Andreas A Kardamakis, Kazuya Saitoh, Sten Grillner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuroscience needs evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Evolution of behavioural control from chordates to primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. The neural bases of vertebrate motor behaviour through the lens of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. The Ecological View of Selective Attention.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. The Dopaminergic Control of Movement-Evolutionary Considerations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019
    Article
  20. No one knows what attention is.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreas A KardamakisNobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; and.
Kazuya SaitohNobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; and Faculty of Education, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
Sten GrillnerNobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden; and sten.grillner@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optic tectum (called superior colliculus in mammals) is critical for eye-head gaze shifts as we navigate in the terrain and need to adapt our movements to the visual scene. The neuronal mechanisms underlying the tectal contribution to stimulus selection and gaze reorientation remains, however, unclear at the microcircuit level. To analyze this complex--yet phylogenetically conserved--sensorimotor system, we developed a novel in vitro preparation in the lamprey that maintains the eye and midbrain intact and allows for whole-cell recordings from prelabeled tectal gaze-controlling cells in the deep layer, while visual stimuli are delivered. We found that receptive field activation of these cells provide monosynaptic retinal excitation followed by local GABAergic inhibition (feedforward). The entire remaining retina, on the other hand, elicits only inhibition (surround inhibition). If two stimuli are delivered simultaneously, one inside and one outside the receptive field, the former excitatory response is suppressed. When local inhibition is pharmacologically blocked, the suppression induced by competing stimuli is canceled. We suggest that this rivalry between visual areas across the tectal map is triggered through long-range inhibitory tectal connections. Selection commands conveyed via gaze-controlling neurons in the optic tectum are, thus, formed through synaptic integration of local retinotopic excitation and global tectal inhibition. We anticipate that this mechanism not only exists in lamprey but is also conserved throughout vertebrate evolution.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsGABAergic Neuronsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidImmunohistochemistryInterneuronsLampreysMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, NeurologicalNeural InhibitionPatch-Clamp TechniquesRetinaldehydeSuperior ColliculiSynapsesSynaptic Transmissiongamma-Aminobutyric AcidRetinaldehydeevolutionGABAergic inhibitiongaze controloptic tectumsuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID25825743
PMCPMC4403191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.