Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825722›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Analysis of cell division patterns in the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem.

Bruce E Shapiro, Cory Tobin, Eric Mjolsness, Elliot M Meyerowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cell growth dynamics in two types of apical meristems in fern gametophytes.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruce E ShapiroDepartment of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330; Division of Biology and Biological Engineering and.
Cory TobinDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering and.
Eric MjolsnessDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
Elliot M MeyerowitzDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; and meyerow@caltech.edu.

Funding

Uncover Strategies Used By Biological SystemsP50GM076516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LANDER, ARTHUR D · 2007 to 2016
$25.1M
Stochastic dynamics for multiscale biologyR01GM086883 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MJOLSNESS, ERIC D · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076516NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM76516NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086883NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM086883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stereotypic pattern of cell shapes in the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem (SAM) suggests that strict rules govern the placement of new walls during cell division. When a cell in the SAM divides, a new wall is built that connects existing walls and divides the cytoplasm of the daughter cells. Because features that are determined by the placement of new walls such as cell size, shape, and number of neighbors are highly regular, rules must exist for maintaining such order. Here we present a quantitative model of these rules that incorporates different observed features of cell division. Each feature is incorporated into a "potential function" that contributes a single term to a total analog of potential energy. New cell walls are predicted to occur at locations where the potential function is minimized. Quantitative terms that represent the well-known historical rules of plant cell division, such as those given by Hofmeister, Errera, and Sachs are developed and evaluated against observed cell divisions in the epidermal layer (L1) of Arabidopsis thaliana SAM. The method is general enough to allow additional terms for nongeometric properties such as internal concentration gradients and mechanical tensile forces.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsArabidopsisCell DivisionCell LineageCell SizeCell WallComputer SimulationMeristemMicroscopy, ConfocalPlant ShootsTime-Lapse ImagingArabidopsiscell divisioncomputer modelinglive imaging

Identifiers

PMID25825722
PMCPMC4403164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.