Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825654›Full record

ReviewHealth information science and systems2013

How bioinformatics influences health informatics: usage of biomolecular sequences, expression profiles and automated microscopic image analyses for clinical needs and public health.

Vladimir Kuznetsov, Hwee Kuan Lee, Sebastian Maurer-Stroh, Maria Judit Molnár, Sandor Pongor, Birgit Eisenhaber, Frank Eisenhaber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health information science and systems, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Welcome to health information science and systems.Health information science and systems · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vladimir KuznetsovBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, 138671 Singapore ; School of Computer Engineering (SCE), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), 50 Nanyang Drive, Singapore, 637553 Singapore.
Hwee Kuan LeeBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, 138671 Singapore.
Sebastian Maurer-StrohBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, 138671 Singapore ; School of Biological Sciences (SBS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore, 637551 Singapore.
Maria Judit MolnárInstitute of Genomic Medicine and Rare Disorders, Tömö Street 25-29, 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Sandor PongorFaculty of Information Technology, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary (PPKE), Práter u. 50/a, 1083, Budapest, Hungary.
Birgit EisenhaberBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, 138671 Singapore.
Frank EisenhaberBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01, Matrix, 138671 Singapore ; School of Computer Engineering (SCE), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), 50 Nanyang Drive, Singapore, 637553 Singapore ; Department of Biological Sciences (DBS), National University of Singapore (NUS), 8 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597 Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe currently hyped expectation of personalized medicine is often associated with just achieving the information technology led integration of biomolecular sequencing, expression and histopathological bioimaging data with clinical records at the individual patients' level as if the significant biomedical conclusions would be its more or less mandatory result. It remains a sad fact that many, if not most biomolecular mechanisms that translate the human genomic information into phenotypes are not known and, thus, most of the molecular and cellular data cannot be interpreted in terms of biomedically relevant conclusions. Whereas the historical trend will certainly be into the general direction of personalized diagnostics and cures, the temperate view suggests that biomedical applications that rely either on the comparison of biomolecular sequences and/or on the already known biomolecular mechanisms have much greater chances to enter clinical practice soon. In addition to considering the general trends, we exemplarily review advances in the area of cancer biomarker discovery, in the clinically relevant characterization of patient-specific viral and bacterial pathogens (with emphasis on drug selection for influenza and enterohemorrhagic E. coli) as well as progress in the automated assessment of histopathological images. As molecular and cellular data analysis will become instrumental for achieving desirable clinical outcomes, the role of bioinformatics and computational biology approaches will dramatically grow. AUTHOR SUMMARY: With DNA sequencing and computers becoming increasingly cheap and accessible to the layman, the idea of integrating biomolecular and clinical patient data seems to become a realistic, short-term option that will lead to patient-specific diagnostics and treatment design for many diseases such as cancer, metabolic disorders, inherited conditions, etc. These hyped expectations will fail since many, if not most biomolecular mechanisms that translate the human genomic information into phenotypes are not known yet and, thus, most of the molecular and cellular data collected will not lead to biomedically relevant conclusions. At the same time, less spectacular biomedical applications based on biomolecular sequence comparison and/or known biomolecular mechanisms have the potential to unfold enormous potential for healthcare and public health. Since the analysis of heterogeneous biomolecular data in context with clinical data will be increasingly critical, the role of bioinformatics and computational biology will grow correspondingly in this process.

Indexed as

AIDSBioinformaticsCancer biomarkerCancer mutationDigital pathologyDry eyeEnterohemorrhagic Escherichia coliExpression profilingGenome sequencingGlaucomaH1N1Histopathological bioimagingHIVInfluenzaQuorum sensingTumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID25825654
PMCPMC4336111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.