Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825651›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2015

Expanding the mammalian phenotype ontology to support automated exchange of high throughput mouse phenotyping data generated by large-scale mouse knockout screens.

Cynthia L Smith, Janan T Eppig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pleiotropy data resource as a primer for investigating co-morbidities/multi-morbidities and their role in disease.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Article
  10. The Human Disease Ontology 2022 update.Nucleic acids research · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DDIEM: drug database for inborn errors of metabolism.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. New models for human disease from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2019
    Review
  18. Xenbase: Facilitating the Use ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cynthia L SmithMouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609 USA.
Janan T EppigMouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609 USA.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Mouse Genome DatabaseU41HG000330 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A, BULT, CAROL J · 2011 to 2020
$45.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG000330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA vast array of data is about to emerge from the large scale high-throughput mouse knockout phenotyping projects worldwide. It is critical that this information is captured in a standardized manner, made accessible, and is fully integrated with other phenotype data sets for comprehensive querying and analysis across all phenotype data types. The volume of data generated by the high-throughput phenotyping screens is expected to grow exponentially, thus, automated methods and standards to exchange phenotype data are required.

resultsThe IMPC (International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium) is using the Mammalian Phenotype (MP) ontology in the automated annotation of phenodeviant data from high throughput phenotyping screens. 287 new term additions with additional hierarchy revisions were made in multiple branches of the MP ontology to accurately describe the results generated by these high throughput screens.

conclusionsBecause these large scale phenotyping data sets will be reported using the MP as the common data standard for annotation and data exchange, automated importation of these data to MGI (Mouse Genome Informatics) and other resources is possible without curatorial effort. Maximum biomedical value of these mutant mice will come from integrating primary high-throughput phenotyping data with secondary, comprehensive phenotypic analyses combined with published phenotype details on these and related mutants at MGI and other resources.

Indexed as

DatabaseData integrationMouseOntologyPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID25825651
PMCPMC4378007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.