Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825553›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2015

Violating the theory of single gene-single disorder: inhibitor development in hemophilia.

Suad AlFadhli, Rasheeba Nizam

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suad AlFadhliDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kuwait University, 31470, Sulaibekhat, Kuwait.
Rasheeba NizamDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kuwait University, 31470, Sulaibekhat, Kuwait.
Kuwait University · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemophilia is clinically and genetically heterogeneous blood disorder with several known gene defects accounting for the diversity of disease phenotype and inhibitor production. Although increasing number of causative mutations have been reported, not much is known regarding the root cause of inhibitor development against infused blood clotting factors, which represents a major challenge in the treatment of disease. The variations in the severity and frequency of bleeding in hemophiliacs with same molecular defect, indicates the role of modifier genes in the pathogenesis of disease. Herein, we aim to review and summarise the literature over the past decade, to gain insight into what is critical for the development of inhibitors in hemophilia. Aside from potential mutations in factor VIII and IX, polymorphisms in various genes such as human leukocyte antigen-I (HLA-I), HLA-II, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4, also tends to contribute to the development of inhibitors. Violating the theory of single gene-single disorder, new research indicates that inhibitor arise from a complex interplay of multiple genetic, immunological and environmental factors. With the revolutionary advances in whole genome sequencing, we propose a detailed genome wide study to identify the spectrum of genetic markers involved in the development of inhibitors for better diagnostics and therapeutics.

Indexed as

HemophiliaInhibitorsMutationsPolymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID25825553
PMCPMC4375149
OpenAlexW2007002020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.