Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25825299›Full record

ArticleNestle Nutrition Institute workshop series2012

Issues and controversies with vitamin A in childhood.

María Teresa Murguía Peniche

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nestle Nutrition Institute workshop series, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Teresa Murguía PenicheInfancy Area, National Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin A deficiency is common in the developing world. Vitamin A supplementation (VAS) has been used to prevent or treat vitamin A deficiency and to decrease mortality and morbidity in children. However, there are still controversial issues in relation to the role of universal VAS in different populations. Thus, studies that look at mortality outcomes reveal that VAS decreases mortality in children >6 months of age; however, there is still controversy on the extent to which reduction in morbidity from diarrhea and respiratory infection, other than measles, decreases mortality. Studies in infants 1-5 months old show no protective effect of VAS on mortality; whether this is secondary to environmental influences (breastfeeding), or interactions with DTP vaccine, needs to be further investigated. Studies with VAS in newborns have resulted in contrasting results in countries in Africa and Asia; trials are underway to better understand this. VAS does not have a universal protective effect on lower respiratory tract infection in children; some studies reveal an increase in respiratory morbidity associated with VAS, especially in well-nourished children; in contrast, VAS may confer some protection to malnourished children. The interaction of VAS with different vaccines is under current debate; some discussions are presented.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsBreast FeedingChildChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesDiarrheaDrug InteractionsHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMeaslesMeta-Analysis as TopicMorbidityNutritional StatusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin A

Identifiers

PMID25825299
OpenAlexW1502630641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.