ArticleMolecular oncology2015
Robust BRCA1-like classification of copy number profiles of samples repeated across different datasets and platforms.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adjuvant capecitabine-containing chemotherapy benefit and homologous recombination deficiency in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients.British journal of cancer · 2022Trial
- Ovarian Cancer-SpecificClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Trial
- Immune induction strategies in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to enhance the sensitivity to PD-1 blockade: the TONIC trial.Nature medicine · 2019Trial
- Detecting homologous recombination deficiency for breast cancer through integrative analysis of genomic data.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of young, node-negative, chemotherapy-naïve, triple-negative breast cancer patients according to BRCA1 status.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Identifying the BRCA1 c.-107A > T variant in Dutch patients with a tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation.Familial cancer · 2023Article
- Chromosomal Instability, Selection and Competition: Factors That Shape the Level of Karyotype Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity.Cancers · 2022Review
- Functional RECAP (REpair CAPacity) assay identifies homologous recombination deficiency undetected by DNA-based BRCAness tests.Oncogene · 2022Article
- PARP Inhibitors: A Major Therapeutic Option in Endocrine-Receptor Positive Breast Cancers.Cancers · 2022Review
- A survey of cancer genome signatures identifies genes connected to distinct chromosomal instability phenotypes.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Article
- Assessment of structural chromosomal instability phenotypes as biomarkers of carboplatin response in triple negative breast cancer: the TNT trial.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021Article
- An immune-centric exploration of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation related breast and ovarian cancers.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Therapeutic targeting of macrophages enhances chemotherapy efficacy by unleashing type I interferon response.Nature cell biology · 2019Article
- Molecular and epigenetic profiles of BRCA1-like hormone-receptor-positive breast tumors identified with development and application of a copy-number-based classifier.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2019Article
- Controversies in oncology: are genomic tests quantifying homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) useful for treatment decision making?ESMO open · 2019Article
- Computational Investigation of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair Deficiency in Sporadic Breast Cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Smoking, second-hand smoke exposure and smoking cessation in relation to leukocyte telomere length and mortality.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Tandem duplications contribute to not one but two distinct phenotypes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- RUBIC identifies driver genes by detecting recurrent DNA copy number breaks.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancers with BRCA1 germline mutation have a characteristic DNA copy number (CN) pattern. We developed a test that assigns CN profiles to be 'BRCA1-like' or 'non-BRCA1-like', which refers to resembling a BRCA1-mutated tumor or resembling a tumor without a BRCA1 mutation, respectively. Approximately one third of the BRCA1-like breast cancers have a BRCA1 mutation, one third has hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter and one third has an unknown reason for being BRCA1-like. This classification is indicative of patients' response to high dose alkylating and platinum containing chemotherapy regimens, which targets the inability of BRCA1 deficient cells to repair DNA double strand breaks. We investigated whether this classification can be reliably obtained with next generation sequencing and copy number platforms other than the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) on which it was originally developed. We investigated samples from 230 breast cancer patients for which a CN profile had been generated on two to five platforms, comprising low coverage CN sequencing, CN extraction from targeted sequencing panels (CopywriteR), Affymetrix SNP6.0, 135K/720K oligonucleotide aCGH, Affymetrix Oncoscan FFPE (MIP) technology, 3K BAC and 32K BAC aCGH. Pairwise comparison of genomic position-mapped profiles from the original aCGH platform and other platforms revealed concordance. For most cases, biological differences between samples exceeded the differences between platforms within one sample. We observed the same classification across different platforms in over 80% of the patients and kappa values of at least 0.36. Differential classification could be attributed to CN profiles that were not strongly associated to one class. In conclusion, we have shown that the genomic regions that define our BRCA1-like classifier are robustly measured by different CN profiling technologies, providing the possibility to retro- and prospectively investigate BRCA1-like classification across a wide range of CN platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.