Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25824862›Full record

ArticleCognition2015

Reward and punishment act as distinct factors in guiding behavior.

Jan Kubanek, Lawrence H Snyder, Richard A Abrams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensorimotor faculties bias choice behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan KubanekDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: kubanek@wustl.edu.
Lawrence H SnyderDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Richard A AbramsDepartment of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER VISION RESEARCHP30EY002687 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Philip Andrew Ruzycki · 1985 to 2026
$18.4M
VISUAL-MOTOR TRANSFORMATIONS IN PARIETAL CORTEXR01EY012135 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, LAWRENCE H · 2000 to 2023
$8.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY002687NEI NIH HHS EY012135NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002687NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavior rests on the experience of reinforcement and punishment. It has been unclear whether reinforcement and punishment act as oppositely valenced components of a single behavioral factor, or whether these two kinds of outcomes play fundamentally distinct behavioral roles. To this end, we varied the magnitude of a reward or a penalty experienced following a choice using monetary tokens. The outcome of each trial was independent of the outcome of the previous trial, which enabled us to isolate and study the effect on behavior of each outcome magnitude in single trials. We found that a reward led to a repetition of the previous choice, whereas a penalty led to an avoidance of the previous choice. Surprisingly, the effects of the reward magnitude and the penalty magnitude revealed a pronounced asymmetry. The choice repetition effect of a reward scaled with the magnitude of the reward. In a marked contrast, the avoidance effect of a penalty was flat, not influenced by the magnitude of the penalty. These effects were mechanistically described using a reinforcement learning model after the model was updated to account for the penalty-based asymmetry. The asymmetry in the effects of the reward magnitude and the punishment magnitude was so striking that it is difficult to conceive that one factor is just a weighted or transformed form of the other factor. Instead, the data suggest that rewards and penalties are fundamentally distinct factors in governing behavior.

Indexed as

PunishmentRewardAcoustic StimulationAdolescentDecision MakingFemaleHumansLearningMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultGainInstrumental (operant) behaviorLaw of effectLossPenaltyReinforcement

Identifiers

PMID25824862
PMCPMC4397189
OpenAlexW2133553987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.