Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25824699›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology reports2015

The five steps of comprehensive psychosocial distress screening.

Mark Lazenby, Hui Tan, Nick Pasacreta, Elizabeth Ercolano, Ruth McCorkle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Psychosocial burden in cancer survivors.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Management of Distress in Patients with Cancer-Are We Doing the Right Thing?Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Toward a health-promoting system for cancer survivors: Patient and provider multiple behavior change.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark LazenbyYale University School of Nursing, PO Box 27399, West Haven, CT, 06516-7399, USA, mark.lazenby@yale.edu.
Hui Tan
Nick Pasacreta
Elizabeth Ercolano
Ruth McCorkle

Funding

Using the RE-AIM Model to Translate Distress Screening into Cancer CareR25CA177553 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCORKLE, RUTH · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA177553NCI NIH HHS R25CA177553-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing recognition of the impact psychosocial distress has on the quality of life of patients with cancer, the implementation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Management Guidelines and the mandate of evidence-based policy for routine distress screening continue to lag. To speed adoption of the guideline, the American Psychosocial Oncology Society (APOS) and Yale School of Nursing (YSN) launched the Screening for Psychosocial Distress Program in 2014. The program resulted in the development of five steps necessary to carry out routine psychosocial distress screening. The steps are consistent with the NCCN Distress Management Guidelines and the new criterion for accreditation by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Commission on Cancer as of 2015. These five steps are as follows: (1) screening, (2) evaluating, (3) referring, (4) following up, and (5) documenting and quality improvement. The purpose of this article is to summarize the detailed procedure of the five steps for cancer care professionals-including oncologists, nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers-so they can manage psychosocial distress efficiently in their own clinical environments.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceQuality of LifeCancer Care FacilitiesEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicReferral and ConsultationStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID25824699
PMCPMC4918509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.