ArticleMolecular psychiatry2016
Whole-genome association analysis of treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- δ2-Protocadherins organize parallel indirect basal ganglia circuits.Science advances · 2026Article
- Advancements in the Understanding of the Genetics of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD).Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Complementary δ2-protocadherin expression delineates parallel basal ganglia circuits in primates.iScience · 2026Article
- Genetic and molecular factors associated with changes in structural-functional coupling in medication-free obsessive-compulsive disorder.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Increased Neuroplasticity in Frontal Cortex to Reduce Compulsive Behavior: A Preclinical tDCS Study in Male Rats.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- The Role of Epigenetics in the Pathogenesis and Potential Treatment of Obsessive-compulsive Disorder.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Psychotic Vulnerability and its Associations with Clinical Characteristics in Adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2023Article
- The role of Pcdh10 in neurological disease and cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Familial risk of psychosis in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Impact on clinical characteristics, comorbidity and treatment response.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Article
- ASD/OCD-Linked Protocadherin-10 Regulates Synapse, But Not Axon, Development in the Amygdala and Contributes to Fear- and Anxiety-Related Behaviors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Genetics of obsessive-compulsive disorder.Psychological medicine · 2021Review
- Specialty knowledge and competency standards for pharmacotherapy for adult obsessive-compulsive disorder.Psychiatry research · 2021Article
- Pharmacotherapeutic Strategies and New Targets in OCD.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Review
- Genomics of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder-Toward Personalized Medicine in the Era of Big Data.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Response to Fluvoxamine in the Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients: Bayesian Ordinal Quantile Regression.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2021Article
- Pharmacogenetics of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Evidence-Update.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Review
- Mood-Stabilizing Antiepileptic Treatment Response in Bipolar Disorder: A Genome-Wide Association Study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Article
- Clinical advances in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a position statement by the International College of Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders.International clinical psychopharmacology · 2020Review
- Cutting-edge genetics in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Faculty reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Up to 30% of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit an inadequate response to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). To date, genetic predictors of OCD treatment response have not been systematically investigated using genome-wide association study (GWAS). To identify specific genetic variations potentially influencing SRI response, we conducted a GWAS study in 804 OCD patients with information on SRI response. SRI response was classified as 'response' (n=514) or 'non-response' (n=290), based on self-report. We used the more powerful Quasi-Likelihood Score Test (the MQLS test) to conduct a genome-wide association test correcting for relatedness, and then used an adjusted logistic model to evaluate the effect size of the variants in probands. The top single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was rs17162912 (P=1.76 × 10(-8)), which is near the DISP1 gene on 1q41-q42, a microdeletion region implicated in neurological development. The other six SNPs showing suggestive evidence of association (P<10(-5)) were rs9303380, rs12437601, rs16988159, rs7676822, rs1911877 and rs723815. Among them, two SNPs in strong linkage disequilibrium, rs7676822 and rs1911877, located near the PCDH10 gene, gave P-values of 2.86 × 10(-6) and 8.41 × 10(-6), respectively. The other 35 variations with signals of potential significance (P<10(-4)) involve multiple genes expressed in the brain, including GRIN2B, PCDH10 and GPC6. Our enrichment analysis indicated suggestive roles of genes in the glutamatergic neurotransmission system (false discovery rate (FDR)=0.0097) and the serotonergic system (FDR=0.0213). Although the results presented may provide new insights into genetic mechanisms underlying treatment response in OCD, studies with larger sample sizes and detailed information on drug dosage and treatment duration are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.