Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25824214›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Plasma and epithelial lining fluid pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane and tazobactam alone and in combination in mice.

M J Melchers, E Mavridou, S Seyedmousavi, A C van Mil, C Lagarde, J W Mouton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  7. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M J MelchersRadboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
E MavridouCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S SeyedmousaviRadboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6194-7447
A C van MilCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C LagardeRadboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J W MoutonRadboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands jwmouton@gmail.com.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ceftolozane is a new cephalosporin with activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms. However, the compound is susceptible to degradation by extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Tazobactam is an ESBL inhibitor and is combined with ceftolozane to broaden its activity. Surprisingly, although tazobactam has been available for over 20 years, few if any reliable data exist on the tazobactam pharmacokinetic (PK) properties in mice. To evaluate the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships in mice, the PK properties of tazobactam and ceftolozane were extensively investigated. Thigh-infected neutropenic CD-1 mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single 0.1-ml dose containing ceftolozane, tazobactam, or both compounds. Ceftolozane was applied in 2-fold-increasing doses of 4 mg/kg of body weight to 64 mg/kg alone or in combination. Tazobactam was combined in reverse doses (thus, 64/4 mg/kg, 32/8 mg/kg, etc.) (n = 2 per time point). In separate validation experiments, ceftolozane-tazobactam was given alone or in combination at 32/8 mg/kg and 8/32 mg/kg (n = 4 per time point). Plasma samples (one per mouse) and bronchoalveolar lavage samples were collected at up to 12 time points until 6 h after administration. There were no significant differences in the ceftolozane and tazobactam PK alone versus combined, indicating no PK interaction. The PKs were linear and dose proportional for both compounds and showed a good penetration in the epithelial lining fluid. The estimated mean (standard deviation) half-life of ceftolozane was 0.287 h (0.031 h), and that of tazobactam was 0.176 h (0.026), and the V was 0.43 liter/kg and 1.14 liter/kg, respectively. The estimates of tazobactam parameters can also be used to (re)interpret PD data.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsEscherichia coliFemaleKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicePenicillanic AcidProtein BindingTazobactamThighAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftolozaneCephalosporinsPenicillanic AcidTazobactam

Identifiers

PMID25824214
PMCPMC4432158
OpenAlexW1557300516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.