Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25824213›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

High prevalence of mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a pediatric population.

Nina K Antonov, Maria C Garzon, Kimberly D Morel, Susan Whittier, Paul J Planet, Christine T Lauren

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of eczema.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Increase in imported mupirocin-resistantNew microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Silver sulfadiazine in modern dermatology.Dermatology online journal · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microbial manipulation in atopic dermatitis.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mupirocin-ResistantBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina K AntonovCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Maria C GarzonDepartment of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Kimberly D MorelDepartment of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Susan WhittierDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Paul J PlanetDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA pjp23@cumc.columbia.edu cat35@cumc.columbia.edu.
Christine T LaurenDepartment of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical mupirocin is used widely to treat skin and soft tissue infections and to eradicate nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Few studies to date have characterized the rates of S. aureus mupirocin resistance in pediatric populations. We retrospectively studied 358 unique S. aureus isolates obtained from 249 children seen in a predominantly outpatient setting by the Division of Pediatric Dermatology at a major academic center in New York City between 1 May 2012 and 17 September 2013. Mupirocin resistance rates and the associated risk factors were determined using a logistic regression analysis. In our patient population, 19.3% of patients had mupirocin-resistant S. aureus isolates at the time of their first culture, and 22.1% of patients with S. aureus infection had a mupirocin-resistant isolate at some time during the study period. Overall, 31.3% of all S. aureus isolates collected during the study period were resistant to mupirocin. Prior mupirocin use was strongly correlated (odds ratio [OR] = 26.5; P = <0.001) with mupirocin resistance. Additional risk factors for mupirocin resistance included methicillin resistance, atopic dermatitis (AD), epidermolysis bullosa (EB), immunosuppression, and residence in northern Manhattan and the Bronx. Resistance to mupirocin is widespread in children with dermatologic complaints in the New York City area, and given the strong association with mupirocin exposure, it is likely that mupirocin use contributes to the increased resistance. Routine mupirocin testing may be important for MRSA decolonization strategies or the treatment of minor skin infections in children.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMupirocinPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMupirocin

Identifiers

PMID25824213
PMCPMC4432188
OpenAlexW2120827464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.