Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015
Reduction in self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: an observational controlled study in east London.
Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Progress in using the electronic health record to improve primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Article
- Improving coding and primary care management for patients with chronic kidney disease: an observational controlled study in East London.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Observational
- Physicians' Views of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not on Insulin.Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2015: strong messages for clinical care in all six research categories.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Author's response.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
- Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
- Improving the effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSelf-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) confers no benefit for many people with type 2 diabetes not being treated with insulin. It accounts for 21% of diabetes prescribing costs.
aimTo improve care quality at reduced cost for type 2 diabetes by reducing unnecessary SMBG. DESIGN AND
settingNon-randomised, observational controlled study in two intervention clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and one control CCG in east London.
methodIn total, 19,602 people with type 2 diabetes not being treated with insulin were recruited from two intervention CCGs; 16,033 were recruited from a control CCG. The intervention (from 2010 to 2013) comprised implementation of a locally developed guideline, including IT support and peer feedback of performance. Data on practice prescribing SMBG testing strips were gathered using GP electronic health records. Information on costs were obtained via the ePACT electronic database.
resultsOver 4 years, in all non-insulin type 2 diabetes treatment groups, use of SMBG was reduced in the two intervention CCGs from 42.8% to 16.5%, and in the control CCG from 56.4% to 47.2%. In people on metformin alone or no treatment, intervention CCGs reduced SMBG use from 29.6% to 6.0%, and in the control CCG use dropped from 47.1% to 38.7% (P<0.001). From 2009 to 2012 the total cost of all SMBG prescribing (type 1 and type 2 diabetes, including users of insulin) was reduced by 4.9% (£62,476) in the two intervention CCGs and increased in the control CCG by 5.0% (£42,607); in England, the total cost increased by 13.5% (£19.4 million). In total, 20% (3865 of 19 602) fewer patients used SMBG in the intervention CCGs.
conclusionThis low-cost programme demonstrated a major reduction in unnecessary prescribing of SMBG, along with cost savings. If replicated nationally, this would avoid unnecessary testing in 340 000 people and prescribing costs that total £21.8 million.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.