Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25823918›Full record

ReviewClinical therapeutics2015

The Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Melanoma.

Kathleen M Mahoney, Gordon J Freeman, David F McDermott

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 316 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
316citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
29.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

316 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 568 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

256 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen M MahoneyDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: kmmah5@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Gordon J FreemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
David F McDermottDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Treating the P13-Kinase/AKTP50CA101942 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Wanling Xie · 2003 to 2026
$53.4M
TIM recognition of phosphatidylserine regulates innate and adaptive immunityP01AI054456 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FREEMAN, GORDON JAMES · 2003 to 2014
$12.8M
Role of Tumor Stroma in Therapeutic Response and ResistanceU54CA163125 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHIN, LYNDA, FLAHERTY, KEITH T · 2011 to 2015
$4.4M
AVIAN RETROVIRUS DNA SYNTHESIS AND ITS REGULATIONSR01CA016312 · NCI · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI GRANDGENETT, DUANE P · 1985 to 2008
$2.3M
TIM recognition of PtdSer on apoptotic cells and the regulation of immunityR01AI089955 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI DEKRUYFF, ROSEMARIE H, FREEMAN, GORDON JAMES · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101942NCI NIH HHS R01 CA016312NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163125NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI054456NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI089955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBlocking the interaction between the programmed cell death (PD)-1 protein and one of its ligands, PD-L1, has been reported to have impressive antitumor responses. Therapeutics targeting this pathway are currently in clinical trials. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are the first of this anti-PD-1 pathway family of checkpoint inhibitors to gain accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. Nivolumab has been associated with improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated wild-type serine/threonine-protein kinase B-raf proto-oncogene BRAF melanoma. Although the most mature data are in the treatment of melanoma, the FDA has granted approval of nivolumab for squamous cell lung cancer and the breakthrough therapy designation to immune- checkpoint inhibitors for use in other cancers: nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, for Hodgkin lymphoma, and MPDL-3280A, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, for bladder cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Here we review the literature on PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade and focus on the reported clinical studies that have included patients with melanoma.

methodsPubMed was searched to identify relevant clinical studies of PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapies in melanoma. A review of data from the current trials on clinicaltrial.gov was incorporated, as well as data presented in abstracts at the 2014 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, given the limited number of published clinical trials on this topic.

findingsThe anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents have been reported to have impressive antitumor effects in several malignancies, including melanoma. The greatest clinical activity in unselected patients has been seen in melanoma. Tumor expression of PD-L1 is a suggestive, but inadequate, biomarker predictive of response to immune-checkpoint blockade. However, tumors expressing little or no PD-L1 are less likely to respond to PD-1 pathway blockade. Combination checkpoint blockade with PD-1 plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 blockade appears to improve response rates in patients who are less likely to respond to single-checkpoint blockade. Toxicity with PD-1 blocking agents is less than the toxicity with previous immunotherapies (eg, interleukin 2, CTLA-4 blockade). Certain adverse events can be severe and potentially life threatening, but most can be prevented or reversed with close monitoring and appropriate management. IMPLICATIONS: This family of immune-checkpoint inhibitors benefits not only patients with metastatic melanoma but also those with historically less responsive tumor types. Although a subset of patients responds to single-agent blockade, the initial trial of checkpoint-inhibitor combinations has reported a potential to improve response rates. Combination therapies appear to be a means of increasing response rates, albeit with increased immune-related adverse events. As these treatments become available to patients, education regarding the recognition and management of immune-related effects of immune-checkpoint blockade will be essential for maximizing clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenCombined Modality TherapyCTLA-4 AntigenHumansImmunotherapyIpilimumabMelanomaNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenBRAF protein, humanCD274 protein, humanCTLA-4 AntigenIpilimumabMAS1 protein, humanNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafmelanomaMPDL3280AnivolumabPD-1PD-L1pembrolizumabpidilizumabprogrammed cell death 1

Identifiers

PMID25823918
PMCPMC4497957
OpenAlexW1975992327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.