ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015
Brain/MINDS: brain-mapping project in Japan.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- A complex network perspective on brain disease.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- From the brain cell atlas to precision neurology: a review of the application of AI-driven multi-omics in brain science.GigaScience · 2026Review
- Data Science in Medical and Healthcare: Current Landscape.Juntendo medical journal · 2025Review
- Conventional and Emerging Drug Targeting Sites in Alzheimer's Disease and the Role of Translational Informatics in its Diagnosis and Management.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Whole-brain causal discovery using fMRI.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- A Novel Directed Seed-Based Connectivity Analysis Toolbox Applied to Human and Marmoset Resting-State FMRI.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Artificial cognition vs. artificial intelligence for next-generation autonomous robotic agents.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Whole-brain Optical Imaging: A Powerful Tool for Precise Brain Mapping at the Mesoscopic Level.Neuroscience bulletin · 2023Review
- A longitudinal resource for population neuroscience of school-age children and adolescents in China.Scientific data · 2023Article
- The Brain/MINDS Marmoset Connectivity Resource: An open-access platform for cellular-level tracing and tractography in the primate brain.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- A reappraisal of the default mode and frontoparietal networks in the common marmoset brain.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2023Article
- A perspective on large-scale simulation as an enabler for novel biorobotics applications.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
- Relationship between Attention Capacity and Hand-Eye Reaction Time in Adolescents between 15 and 18 Years of Age.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Progress of the China brain project.Medical review (2021) · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence and Big Data in neurology.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2022Article
- An open-source tool for automated analysis of breathing behaviors in common marmosets and rodents.eLife · 2022Article
- BrainBase: a curated knowledgebase for brain diseases.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Brain augmentation and neuroscience technologies: current applications, challenges, ethics and future prospects.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Decoding psychosis: from national genome project to national brain project.General psychiatry · 2022Article
- Miniature microscopes for manipulating and recording in vivo brain activity.Microscopy (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an emerging interest in brain-mapping projects in countries across the world, including the USA, Europe, Australia and China. In 2014, Japan started a brain-mapping project called Brain Mapping by Integrated Neurotechnologies for Disease Studies (Brain/MINDS). Brain/MINDS aims to map the structure and function of neuronal circuits to ultimately understand the vast complexity of the human brain, and takes advantage of a unique non-human primate animal model, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). In Brain/MINDS, the RIKEN Brain Science Institute acts as a central institute. The objectives of Brain/MINDS can be categorized into the following three major subject areas: (i) structure and functional mapping of a non-human primate brain (the marmoset brain); (ii) development of innovative neurotechnologies for brain mapping; and (iii) human brain mapping; and clinical research. Brain/MINDS researchers are highly motivated to identify the neuronal circuits responsible for the phenotype of neurological and psychiatric disorders, and to understand the development of these devastating disorders through the integration of these three subject areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.