Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25823767›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2015

Evaluation of the ESPGHAN Celiac Guidelines in a North American Pediatric Population.

Dominica Gidrewicz, Kathryn Potter, Cynthia L Trevenen, Martha Lyon, J Decker Butzner

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applicability of ESPGHAN Biopsy-Free Guidelines for Celiac Disease Diagnosis: Insights from Türkiye.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of Celiac Disease by Minimally Invasive Biomarkers in a Spanish Pediatric Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Exome Sequencing Identifies the Extremely RareFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Coeliac disease: to biopsy or not?Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  20. The serological diagnosis of coeliac disease - a step forward.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dominica GidrewiczDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kathryn PotterDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cynthia L TrevenenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Martha LyonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
J Decker ButznerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CASaskatchewan Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe retrospectively examined the performance of the tissue transglutaminase (TTG), endomysial antibody (EMA) tests, and the ESPGHAN (European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition) nonbiopsy criteria in a pediatric population.

methodsConsecutive celiac serologies and corresponding intestinal biopsy results were obtained on children <18 years old over 3.5 years. Patients were classified into three categories: positive TTG, negative TTG, and IgA deficiency.

resultsOf the 17,505 patients with celiac serology performed, 775 had a positive TTG, 574 with a negative TTG were biopsied, and 25 were IgA deficient. Of the patients with a TTG ≥10 × upper limit of normal (ULN), positive EMA, and symptoms, 98.2% had biopsies consistent with celiac disease (CD). Four human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ2/DQ8-positive patients who met the ESPGHAN nonbiopsy criteria did not have CD. In the group with a TTG 3-10 × ULN, 75.7% EMA-positive patients and only 40% EMA-negative patients had CD (P<0.001). Of those with a TTG 1-3 × ULN, 52.2% EMA-positive patients vs. only 13.3% EMA-negative patients had CD (P<0.01). Of the patients with bulbar and duodenal biopsies, 9.8% had CD confined only in the bulb, especially those with a low titer TTG (P<0.01). CD prevalence in our cohort was 34.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the TTG were 98.7%, 86.4%, and 79.4%, respectively.

conclusionsThe TTG is a very sensitive screen for CD, but positive predictive value improves with a positive EMA titer. To apply the new ESPGHAN guidelines, clinicians must understand the performance of their celiac serology tests.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAutoantibodiesBiopsyCeliac DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolDiet, Gluten-FreeDuodenumFemaleGTP-Binding ProteinsHLA-DQ AntigensHumansImmunoglobulin AInfantMaleAutoantibodiesGTP-Binding ProteinsHLA-DQ2 antigenHLA-DQ8 antigenHLA-DQ AntigensImmunoglobulin AProtein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2Transglutaminases

Identifiers

PMID25823767
OpenAlexW2027912386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.