Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25823765›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2015

A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of the effect of a radiation-attenuating drape on radiation exposure to endoscopy staff during ERCP.

Thiruvengadam Muniraj, Harry R Aslanian, Loren Laine, James Farrell, Maria M Ciarleglio, Yanhong Deng, Henry Ho, Priya A Jamidar

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thiruvengadam MunirajSection of Digestive Disease, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Harry R AslanianSection of Digestive Disease, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Loren Laine1] Section of Digestive Disease, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA [2] VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
James FarrellSection of Digestive Disease, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Maria M CiarleglioDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Yanhong DengYale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Henry HoSection of Digestive Disease, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Priya A JamidarSection of Digestive Disease, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Yale University · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with radiation exposure to the endoscopist and staff that may be significant in high-volume centers. We investigated whether a radiation-attenuating drape over the fluoroscopy image intensifier reduces radiation exposure during ERCP.

methodsWe performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of 100 therapeutic ERCPs at a tertiary-care university center. Procedures were randomly assigned to groups receiving lead-free radiation-attenuating drapes (n=50) or identical sham drapes (n=50). The drapes were suspended around the fluoroscopy image intensifier during ERCP. The primary end point was the effective dose of radiation measured at the endoscopist's eye and neck, and at the assisting nurse's neck. The cumulative annual radiation exposure was also estimated.

resultsFluoroscopy time, absorbed radiation dose, and dose area product were similar in the study groups. Mean effective dose for sham vs. radiation-attenuating drape was 0.21±0.27 vs. 0.02±0.02 mSv at the endoscopist's eye, 0.35±0.44 vs. 0.03±0.03 mSv at the endoscopist's neck, and 0.27±0.34 vs. 0.02±0.02 mSv at the nurse's neck (P<0.0001 for all comparisons). The relative risk reduction in radiation was 90%, 91%, and 93% at the three sites. At a high-volume center in which an endoscopist performs 500 therapeutic ERCPs per year, the estimated cumulative annual effective dose at the endoscopist's eye level is 126 mSv with conventional protection and 12 mSv with a radiation-attenuating drape, with the recommended limit being 20 mSv.

conclusionsThe addition of a radiation-attenuating drape around the image intensifier during ERCP significantly decreases radiation exposure to endoscopists and staff by ∼90%.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeGastroenterologyNursing StaffProtective DevicesAbsorption, RadiationDouble-Blind MethodEyeFluoroscopyHumansNeckOccupational ExposureProspective StudiesRadiation DosageRadiation Protection

Identifiers

PMID25823765
OpenAlexW1969058471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.