Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25823600›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2015

Analysis of cytokine production by peanut-reactive T cells identifies residual Th2 effectors in highly allergic children who received peanut oral immunotherapy.

J A Wisniewski, S P Commins, R Agrawal, K E Hulse, M D Yu, J Cronin, P W Heymann, A Pomes, T A Platts-Mills, L Workman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. HLA-DRAllergy · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. High- and low-dose oral immunotherapy similarly suppress pro-allergic cytokines and basophil activation in young children.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Emerging Food Allergy Biomarkers.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Biomarkers in Food Allergy Immunotherapy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Multifaceted B Cell Response in Allergen Immunotherapy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. TThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J A WisniewskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
S P ComminsDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
R AgrawalDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
K E HulseDivision of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
M D YuDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
J CroninDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
P W HeymannDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
A PomesIndoor Biotechnologies Inc., Charlottesville, VA, USA.
T A Platts-MillsDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
L WorkmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
J A WoodfolkDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia Health System · USIndoor Biotechnologies (United States) · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAM IN IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007496 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Michael G. Brown, Coleen A McNamara · 1995 to 2026
$10.2M
Systems Genetics Approach to Gene Discovery in Chronic RhinosinusitisU19AI106683 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KERN, ROBERT C · 2014 to 2017
$7.9M
DUST MITE, COCKROACH AND CAT ALLERGENS IN HOUSES/ASTHMAR01AI020565 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI PLATTS-MILLS, THOMAS A. · 1985 to 2017
$7.1M
Mechanisms of airways pH deviation in asthma and chronic coughU19AI070364 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HUNT, JOHN F · 2006 to 2010
$6.0M
Career Development in Women's Health (CDWH)K12HD055884 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DUNAIF, ANDREA E · 2007 to 2016
$4.2M
Immune Response to Cat: Regulatory and Effector T CellsR01AI052196 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI WOODFOLK, JUDITH A · 2004 to 2013
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI020565NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI-052196NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052196NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007496NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI-070364NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI070364NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI106683NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly limited evidence is available regarding the cytokine repertoire of effector T cells associated with peanut allergy, and how these responses relate to IgE antibodies to peanut components.

objectiveTo interrogate T cell effector cytokine populations induced by Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 among peanut allergic (PA) children in the context of IgE and to evaluate their modulation during oral immunotherapy (OIT).

methodsPeanut-reactive effector T cells were analysed in conjunction with specific IgE profiles in PA children using intracellular staining and multiplex assay. Cytokine-expressing T cell subpopulations were visualized using SPICE.

resultsAra h 2 dominated the antibody response to peanut as judged by prevalence and quantity among a cohort of children with IgE to peanut. High IgE (> 15 kU(A)/L) was almost exclusively associated with dual sensitization to Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 and was age independent. Among PA children, IL-4-biased responses to both major allergens were induced, regardless of whether IgE antibodies to Ara h 1 were present. Among subjects receiving OIT in whom high IgE was maintained, Th2 reactivity to peanut components persisted despite clinical desensitization and modulation of allergen-specific immune parameters including augmented specific IgG4 antibodies, Th1 skewing and enhanced IL-10. The complexity of cytokine-positive subpopulations within peanut-reactive IL-4(+) and IFN-γ(+) T cells was similar to that observed in those who received no OIT, but was modified with extended therapy. Nonetheless, high Foxp3 expression was a distinguishing feature of peanut-reactive IL-4(+) T cells irrespective of OIT, and a correlate of their ability to secrete type 2 cytokines.

conclusionAlthough total numbers of peanut-reactive IL-4(+) and IFN-γ(+) T cells are modulated by OIT in highly allergic children, complex T cell populations with pathogenic potential persist in the presence of recognized immune markers of successful immunotherapy.

Indexed as

2S Albumins, PlantAdministration, OralAdolescentAllergensAntigens, PlantChildChild, PreschoolCytokinesDesensitization, ImmunologicFemaleGlycoproteinsHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GImmunophenotypingInfant2S Albumins, PlantAllergensAntigens, PlantAra h 2 allergen, Arachis hypogaeaCytokinesGlycoproteinsImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GInterleukin-4Ara h 1Ara h 2cytokinesIgEoral immunotherapypeanut allergyTh1Th2

Identifiers

PMID25823600
PMCPMC4472497
OpenAlexW2138476409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.