Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25823012›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Identifying the association of contrast enhancement with vascular endothelia growth factor expression in anaplastic gliomas: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis.

Yinyan Wang, Kai Wang, Hongming Li, Jiangfei Wang, Lei Wang, Jianping Dai, Tao Jiang, Jun Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Radiogenomic analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with diffuse gliomas.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yinyan WangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hongming LiInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiangfei WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jianping DaiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tao JiangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.
Jun MaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNBeijing Institute of Neurosurgery · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast enhancement is a crucial radiologic feature of malignant brain tumors, which are associated with genetic changes of the tumor. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the potential relationship among tumor contrast enhancement with MR imaging, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, and survival outcome in anaplastic gliomas. MR images from 240 patients with histologically confirmed anaplastic gliomas were retrospectively analyzed. The volumes of T2 hyperintense, contrast enhanced regions and necrotic regions on postcontrast T1-weighted images were measured. The ratio of the enhanced volume to necrotic volume was compared between patients with high versus low levels of VEGF expression and was further used in the survival analysis. The volumetric ratio of enhancement to necrosis was significantly higher in patients with low VEGF expression than in those with high VEGF expression (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.009). In addition, the enhancement/necrosis ratio was identified as a significant predictor of progression-free survival (Cox regression model, p = 0.004) and overall survival (Cox regression model, p = 0.006) in the multivariate analysis. These results suggest that the volumetric ratio of enhancement to necrosis could serve as a noninvasive radiographic marker associated with VEGF expression and that this ratio is an independent predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with anaplastic gliomas.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiographic Image EnhancementRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisContrast MediaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25823012
PMCPMC4379034
OpenAlexW1982699891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.