Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822978›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

Patient characteristics associated with measurement of routine diabetes care: an observational study.

Arna L Van Doorn-Klomberg, Jozé C C Braspenning, Femke Atsma, Birgit Jansen, Margriet Bouma, René J Wolters, Michel Wensing

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Social inequalities in care for the elderly with diabetes in Brazil.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arna L Van Doorn-KlombergScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jozé C C BraspenningScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Femke AtsmaScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Birgit JansenScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Margriet BoumaDutch College of General Practitioners (NHG), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
René J WoltersScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michel WensingScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-modifiable patient characteristics, including age, gender, ethnicity as well as the occurrence of multi-morbidities, are associated with processes and outcomes of diabetes care. Information on these factors can be used in case mix adjustment of performance measures. However, the practical relevance of such adjustment is not clear. The aim of this study was to assess the strength of associations between patient factors and diabetes care processes and outcomes.

methodsWe performed an observational study based on routinely collected data of 12,498 diabetes patients in 59 Dutch primary care practices. Data were collected on patient age, gender, whether the patient lived in a deprived area, body mass index and the co-occurrence of cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression or anxiety. Outcomes included 6 dichotomous measures (3 process and 3 outcome related) regarding glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol. We performed separate hierarchical logistic mixed model regression models for each of the outcome measures.

resultsEach of the process measure models showed moderate effect sizes, with pooled areas under the curve that varied between 0.66 and 0.76. The frequency of diabetes related consultations as a measure of patient compliance to treatment showed the strongest association with all process measures (odds ratios between 5.6 and 14.5). The effect sizes of the outcome measure models were considerably smaller than the process measure models, with pooled areas under the curve varying from 0.57 to 0.61.

conclusionsSeveral non-modifiable patient factors could be associated with processes and outcomes of diabetes care. However, associations were small. These results suggest that case-mix correction or stratification in assessing diabetes care has limited practical relevance.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareRisk Adjustment

Identifiers

PMID25822978
PMCPMC4378926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.