Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822954›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2015

Performance of computer vision in vivo flow cytometry with low fluorescence contrast.

Stacey Markovic, Siyuan Li, Mark Niedre

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An Overview of Advances in Rare Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. In Vivo Flow Cytometry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  3. Flow-regulated endothelial glycocalyx determines metastatic cancer cell activity.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey Markovic
Siyuan Li
Mark Niedre
Northeastern University · US

Funding

High Resolution Multiplexed Fluorescence TomographyR01EB012117 · NIBIB · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI NIEDRE, MARK JONATHAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Tomographic In Vivo Flow Cytometer for Counting Rare Circulating CellsR21HL098750 · NHLBI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI NIEDRE, MARK JONATHAN · 2010 to 2011
$419k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL098750NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL098750NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012117NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB012117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection and enumeration of circulating cells in the bloodstream of small animals are important in many areas of preclinical biomedical research, including cancer metastasis, immunology, and reproductive medicine. Optical in vivo flow cytometry (IVFC) represents a class of technologies that allow noninvasive and continuous enumeration of circulating cells without drawing blood samples. We recently developed a technique termed computer vision in vivo flow cytometry (CV-IVFC) that uses a high-sensitivity fluorescence camera and an automated computer vision algorithm to interrogate relatively large circulating blood volumes in the ear of a mouse. We detected circulating cells at concentrations as low as 20 cells/mL. In the present work, we characterized the performance of CV-IVFC with low-contrast imaging conditions with (1) weak cell fluorescent labeling using cell-simulating fluorescent microspheres with varying brightness and (2) high background tissue autofluorescence by varying autofluorescence properties of optical phantoms. Our analysis indicates that CV-IVFC can robustly track and enumerate circulating cells with at least 50% sensitivity even in conditions with two orders of magnitude degraded contrast than our previous in vivo work. These results support the significant potential utility of CV-IVFC in a wide range of in vivo biological models.

Indexed as

Blood CellsContrast MediaAlgorithmsAnimalsBlood Cell CountComputersEar AuricleFlow CytometryMiceMicrospheresPhantoms, ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID25822954
PMCPMC4377326
OpenAlexW2058940908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.