ArticlePloS one2015
MRI-based intelligence quotient (IQ) estimation with sparse learning.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain networks and intelligence: A graph neural network based approach to resting state fMRI data.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Deep learning of structural MRI predicts fluid, crystallized, and general intelligence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Brain Networks and Intelligence: A Graph Neural Network Based Approach to Resting State fMRI Data.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Prediction of Adolescents' Fluid Intelligence Scores based on Deep Learning with Reconstruction Regularization.Research square · 2024Article
- Inferring neurocognition using artificial intelligence on brain MRIs.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2024Review
- Accounting for temporal variability in functional magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of intelligence.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Predictive models demonstrate age-dependent association of subcortical volumes and cognitive measures.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Transdiagnostic connectome signatures from resting-state fMRI predict individual-level intellectual capacity.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Linking interindividual variability in brain structure to behaviour.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Prediction of fluid intelligence from T1-w MRI images: A precise two-step deep learning framework.PloS one · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Pb concentrations in selected vegetables and portable drinking water, and intelligent quotients of school children in Ishiagu-a Pb mining community: health risk assessment using predictive modelling.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020Article
- Age-dependent brain volume and neuropsychological changes after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- Linking Brain Biology to Intellectual Endowment: A Review on the Associations of Human Intelligence With Neuroimaging Data.Basic and clinical neuroscienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel framework for IQ estimation using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. In particular, we devise a new feature selection method based on an extended dirty model for jointly considering both element-wise sparsity and group-wise sparsity. Meanwhile, due to the absence of large dataset with consistent scanning protocols for the IQ estimation, we integrate multiple datasets scanned from different sites with different scanning parameters and protocols. In this way, there is large variability in these different datasets. To address this issue, we design a two-step procedure for 1) first identifying the possible scanning site for each testing subject and 2) then estimating the testing subject's IQ by using a specific estimator designed for that scanning site. We perform two experiments to test the performance of our method by using the MRI data collected from 164 typically developing children between 6 and 15 years old. In the first experiment, we use a multi-kernel Support Vector Regression (SVR) for estimating IQ values, and obtain an average correlation coefficient of 0.718 and also an average root mean square error of 8.695 between the true IQs and the estimated ones. In the second experiment, we use a single-kernel SVR for IQ estimation, and achieve an average correlation coefficient of 0.684 and an average root mean square error of 9.166. All these results show the effectiveness of using imaging data for IQ prediction, which is rarely done in the field according to our knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.