Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822811›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2015

Estimating Intracranial Volume in Brain Research: An Evaluation of Methods.

Saman Sargolzaei, Arman Sargolzaei, Mercedes Cabrerizo, Gang Chen, Mohammed Goryawala, Alberto Pinzon-Ardila, Sergio M Gonzalez-Arias, Malek Adjouadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lifetime major depression and grey-matter volumeJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2019
    Article
  12. A Comparative Study of Automatic Approaches for Preclinical MRI-based Brain Segmentation in the Developing Rat.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2018
    Article
  13. Altered Associations between Pain Symptoms and Brain Morphometry in the Pain Matrix of HIV-Seropositive Individuals.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saman SargolzaeiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Arman SargolzaeiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Mercedes CabrerizoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Gang ChenScientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mohammed GoryawalaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Alberto Pinzon-ArdilaBaptist Health Neuroscience Center, Baptist Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Sergio M Gonzalez-AriasBaptist Health Neuroscience Center, Baptist Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Malek AdjouadiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. adjouadi@fiu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial volume (ICV) is a standard measure often used in morphometric analyses to correct for head size in brain studies. Inaccurate ICV estimation could introduce bias in the outcome. The current study provides a decision aid in defining protocols for ICV estimation across different subject groups in terms of sampling frequencies that can be optimally used on the volumetric MRI data, and type of software most suitable for use in estimating the ICV measure. Four groups of 53 subjects are considered, including adult controls (AC, adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD), pediatric controls (PC) and group of pediatric epilepsy subjects (PE). Reference measurements were calculated for each subject by manually tracing intracranial cavity without sub-sampling. The reliability of reference measurements were assured through intra- and inter- variation analyses. Three publicly well-known software packages (FreeSurfer Ver. 5.3.0, FSL Ver. 5.0, SPM8 and SPM12) were examined in their ability to automatically estimate ICV across the groups. Results on sub-sampling studies with a 95 % confidence showed that in order to keep the accuracy of the inter-leaved slice sampling protocol above 99 %, sampling period cannot exceed 20 mm for AC, 25 mm for PC, 15 mm for AD and 17 mm for the PE groups. The study assumes a priori knowledge about the population under study into the automated ICV estimation. Tuning of the parameters in FSL and the use of proper atlas in SPM showed significant reduction in the systematic bias and the error in ICV estimation via these automated tools. SPM12 with the use of pediatric template is found to be a more suitable candidate for PE group. SPM12 and FSL subjected to tuning are the more appropriate tools for the PC group. The random error is minimized for FS in AD group and SPM8 showed less systematic bias. Across the AC group, both SPM12 and FS performed well but SPM12 reported lesser amount of systematic bias.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlzheimer DiseaseBrainChildEpilepsyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsFreeSurfer (RRID:nif-0000-00304)FSL (RRID:nif-0000-00305)Intracranial volume estimationMRISPM (RRID:nif-0000-00343)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.