Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822701›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2015

Investigation of the status of interhospital transport of critically ill pediatric patients.

Jun Qiu, Xiao-Li Wu, Zheng-Hui Xiao, Xian Hu, Xue-Li Quan, Yi-Min Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun QiuDepartment of Children's Intensive Research Center, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, 410007, China.
Xiao-Li Wu
Zheng-Hui Xiao
Xian Hu
Xue-Li Quan
Yi-Min Zhu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the unequal distribution of medical resources in developing countries, critically ill children need to be transferred to tertiary hospitals from primary hospitals with limited resources. Although a large number of critically ill children are transferred each day in China, the standard process of inter-hospital transport is not formulated.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data collected during transport. A total number of 9231 patients (≤14 years) who had been transferred to the Hunan Children's Hospital by a specialized team from primary hospitals from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2012 were included in the study.

resultsNearly half of the critically ill children were neonates (48.72%) and two thirds of the children were suffering from respiratory, neurological and cardiac diseases. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. Mobilization time in non-working hours was longer than the working hours (OR=1.186, 95% CI=1.059-1.329). Our study showed that mobilization time for neonates was shorter than that for older children (OR=0.801, 95% CI=0.692-0.928). The mobilization time of referral cases was shorter in areas within a radius of 50 km than in those within a radius of over 250 km (OR=0.427, 95% CI=0.350-0.521). Referred patients in summer needed a significantly shorter mobilization time than in winter (OR=0.705, 95% CI=0.616-0.806).

conclusionStandardized processes and guidelines for inter-hospital transport would be essential to ensure effective transport of patients and reduce the mobilization activation time.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePatient TransferReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.