ArticlePloS one2015
Properties of protein drug target classes.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI accelerate the identification of druggable targets by 3D structures of proteins and compounds.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- PS3N: leveraging protein sequence-structure similarity for novel drug-drug interaction discovery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Biochemical and Cellular Assay Conditions and the Need for a Buffer That Mimics Cytoplasmic Environments.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- DrugProtAI: A machine learning-driven approach for predicting protein druggability through feature engineering and robust partition-based ensemble methods.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Molecular insights into pangenome localization and constructs design for Hemophilus influenza vaccine.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Influence of lipid saturation on the structural properties of styrene maleic acid lipid nanoparticles (SMALPs).Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2025Article
- DRLiPS: a novel method for prediction of druggable RNA-small molecule binding pockets using machine learning.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Characterizing Protein Corona, Nanobiological Interactions, and Advancing Drug Discovery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Structural Dynamics of the Slide Helix of Inactive/Closed Conformation of KirBac1.1 in Micelles and Membranes: A Fluorescence Approach.The Journal of membrane biology · 2025Article
- Deep learning methods for protein function prediction.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Article
- Computational approach for drug discovery against Gardnerella vaginalis in quest for safer and effective treatments for bacterial vaginosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of a novel MgtE homolog and its structural dynamics in membrane mimetics.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- A multimodal Transformer Network for protein-small molecule interactions enhances predictions of kinase inhibition and enzyme-substrate relationships.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer among 2074 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Chloride/Multiple Anion Exchanger SLC26A Family: Systemic Roles of SLC26A4 in Various Organs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- LDS-CNN: a deep learning framework for drug-target interactions prediction based on large-scale drug screening.Health information science and systems · 2023Article
- Identifying proteomic risk factors for overall, aggressive and early onset prostate cancer using Mendelian randomization and tumor spatial transcriptomics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Predicting congenital renal tract malformation genes using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- PINNED: identifying characteristics of druggable human proteins using an interpretable neural network.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of drug targets is a crucial part of any drug development program. We mined the human proteome to discover properties of proteins that may be important in determining their suitability for pharmaceutical modulation. Data was gathered concerning each protein's sequence, post-translational modifications, secondary structure, germline variants, expression profile and drug target status. The data was then analysed to determine features for which the target and non-target proteins had significantly different values. This analysis was repeated for subsets of the proteome consisting of all G-protein coupled receptors, ion channels, kinases and proteases, as well as proteins that are implicated in cancer. Machine learning was used to quantify the proteins in each dataset in terms of their potential to serve as a drug target. This was accomplished by first inducing a random forest that could distinguish between its targets and non-targets, and then using the random forest to quantify the drug target likeness of the non-targets. The properties that can best differentiate targets from non-targets were primarily those that are directly related to a protein's sequence (e.g. secondary structure). Germline variants, expression levels and interactions between proteins had minimal discriminative power. Overall, the best indicators of drug target likeness were found to be the proteins' hydrophobicities, in vivo half-lives, propensity for being membrane bound and the fraction of non-polar amino acids in their sequences. In terms of predicting potential targets, datasets of proteases, ion channels and cancer proteins were able to induce random forests that were highly capable of distinguishing between targets and non-targets. The non-target proteins predicted to be targets by these random forests comprise the set of the most suitable potential future drug targets, and should therefore be prioritised when building a drug development programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.