Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822477›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2015

A Conceptual Framework for Improving Critical Care Patient Flow and Bed Use.

Kusum S Mathews, Elisa F Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Things We Do for No Reason™: Discharge before noon.Journal of hospital medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Flow-Sizing Critical Care Resources.Critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Boarding of critically Ill patients in the emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kusum S Mathews1 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8810-2794
Elisa F Long3 UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

MOUNT SINAI EMERGENCY MEDICINE RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMK12HL109005 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RICHARDSON, LYNNE D. · 2011 to 2015
$3.9M
Optimizing ED to ICU triage decisions for critically ill patients in respiratory distressK23HL130648 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MATHEWS, KUSUM SARA · 2016 to 2021
$744k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1K12HL109005-01NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL109005NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL130648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleHigh demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services and limited bed availability have prompted hospitals to address capacity planning challenges. Simulation modeling can examine ICU bed assignment policies, accounting for patient acuity, to reduce ICU admission delays.

objectivesTo provide a framework for data-driven modeling of ICU patient flow, identify key measurable outcomes, and present illustrative analysis demonstrating the impact of various bed allocation scenarios on outcomes.

methodsA description of key inputs for constructing a queuing model was outlined, and an illustrative simulation model was developed to reflect current triage protocol within the medical ICU and step-down unit (SDU) at a single tertiary-care hospital. Patient acuity, arrival rate, and unit length of stay, consisting of a "service time" and "time to transfer," were estimated from 12 months of retrospective data (n = 2,710 adult patients) for 36 ICU and 15 SDU staffed beds. Patient priority was based on acuity and whether the patient originated in the emergency department. The model simulated the following hypothetical scenarios: (1) varied ICU/SDU sizes, (2) reserved ICU beds as a triage strategy, (3) lower targets for time to transfer out of the ICU, and (4) ICU expansion by up to four beds. Outcomes included ICU admission wait times and unit occupancy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWith current bed allocation, simulated wait time averaged 1.13 (SD, 1.39) hours. Reallocating all SDU beds as ICU decreased overall wait times by 7.2% to 1.06 (SD, 1.39) hours and increased bed occupancy from 80 to 84%. Reserving the last available bed for acute patients reduced wait times for acute patients from 0.84 (SD, 1.12) to 0.31 (SD, 0.30) hours, but tripled subacute patients' wait times from 1.39 (SD, 1.81) to 4.27 (SD, 5.44) hours. Setting transfer times to wards for all ICU/SDU patients to 1 hour decreased wait times for incoming ICU patients, comparable to building one to two additional ICU beds.

conclusionsHospital queuing and simulation modeling with empiric data inputs can evaluate how changes in ICU bed assignment could impact unit occupancy levels and patient wait times. Trade-offs associated with dedicating resources for acute patients versus expanding capacity for all patients can be examined.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBed OccupancyComputer SimulationFemaleHealth Care RationingHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedModels, OrganizationalPatient AcuityPatient SelectionResource Allocationcomputer simulationintensive care unitqueuing theoryresource allocation

Identifiers

PMID25822477
PMCPMC4590022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.