ArticleJAMA pediatrics2015
Association of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes With Glyburide vs Insulin in Women With Gestational Diabetes.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal uric acid levels and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies including 105,380 participants.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Metformin, Glyburide, and Insulin in Treating Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes research · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of glyburide and insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- The association between gestational diabetes mellitus and Dietary Diabetes Risk Reduction Score: a case-control study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- The socio-environmental exposome and maternal cardiometabolic health in the us: a machine learning approach.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Impaired vascular function in gestational diabetes: evidence for metabolic memory, endothelial dysfunction and altered smooth muscle cell biology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- From Standard of Care to Emerging Innovations: Navigating the Evolution of Pharmacological Treatment of Gestational Diabetes.American journal of perinatology · 2025Review
- Navigating Diabetes in Pregnancy: Critical Approaches to Mitigate Risks and Improve Outcomes for Mother and Child.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Gestational diabetes mellitus - more than the eye can see - a warning sign for future maternal health with transgenerational impact.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Review
- Gestational Diabetes: An Update 60 Years After O'Sullivan and Mahan.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
- Unraveling the role of microRNAs: potential biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus revealed through RNA sequencing analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Neighborhood Environment and Poor Maternal Glycemic Control-Associated Complications of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.AJPM focus · 2024Article
- Article
- Insulin Use During Gestational and Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Study Design.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024Review
- Self-Care Behaviors in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Management of pregnancy in women with monogenic diabetes due to mutations inFrontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Toward a Precision Treatment Approach for Metabolic Depression: Integrating Epidemiology, Neuroscience, and Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Validity of Administrative Data for Gestational Diabetes Ascertainment.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023Article
- [Gestational diabetes mellitus (Update 2023)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceGlyburide is thought to be safe for use during pregnancy for treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, there are limited data on the effectiveness of glyburide when compared with insulin as used in a real-world setting.
objectiveTo estimate the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM treated with glyburide compared with insulin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRetrospective cohort study of a population-based cohort from a nationwide US employer-based insurance claims database from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2011. We identified women with GDM and their newborns. We excluded those with type 1 or 2 diabetes and those younger than 15 years or older than 45 years. EXPOSURES: Treatment with glyburide or insulin during pregnancy within 150 days before delivery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used binomial regression to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences with 95% confidence intervals for the association of glyburide with diagnosis codes for obstetric trauma, cesarean delivery, birth injury, preterm birth, hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, jaundice, large for gestational age, and hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit. Inverse probability of treatment weights were used to adjust for maternal characteristics that differed between the treatment groups.
resultsAmong 110,879 women with GDM, 9173 women (8.3%) were treated with glyburide (n = 4982) or insulin (n = 4191). After adjusting for differences at baseline, newborns of women treated with glyburide were at increased risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.23-1.62), respiratory distress (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.23-2.15), hypoglycemia (RR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.00-1.95), birth injury (RR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00-1.82), and large for gestational age (RR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.16-1.76) compared with those treated with insulin; they were not at increased risk for obstetric trauma (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.71-1.20), preterm birth (RR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.93-1.21), or jaundice (RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48-1.91). The risk of cesarean delivery was 3% lower in the glyburide group (adjusted RR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.00). The risk difference associated with glyburide was 2.97% (95% CI, 1.82-4.12) for neonatal intensive care unit admission, 1.41% (95% CI, 0.61-2.20) for large for gestational age, and 1.11% (95% CI, 0.50-1.72) for respiratory distress. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Newborns from privately insured mothers treated with glyburide were more likely to experience adverse outcomes than those from mothers treated with insulin. Given the widespread use of glyburide, further investigation of these differences in pregnancy outcomes is a public health priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.