Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822137›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2015

Association between apple consumption and physician visits: appealing the conventional wisdom that an apple a day keeps the doctor away.

Matthew A Davis, Julie P W Bynum, Brenda E Sirovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Association between dietary zinc intake andFrontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  5. SGLT2 Inhibitors and Ketone Metabolism in Heart Failure.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2022
    Article
  6. Endophytic bacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew A DavisThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire2Division of Systems Leadership and Effectiveness Science, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor.
Julie P W BynumThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Brenda E SirovichThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire3Veteran Affairs Medical Center Outcomes Group, White River Junction, Vermont.

Funding

Outcomes Calculators for Informed Decision Making in Back SurgeryP60AR062799 · NIAMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BYNUM, JULIE PW · 2012 to 2016
$6.1M
The United States Complementary and Alternative Medicine MarketK01AT006162 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVIS, MATTHEW A · 2010 to 2014
$706k
NCCIH NIH HHS 5K01AT006162NCCIH NIH HHS K01 AT006162NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR062799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceFruit consumption is believed to have beneficial health effects, and some claim, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away."

objectiveTo examine the relationship between eating an apple a day and keeping the doctor away. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized US adult population. A total of 8728 adults 18 years and older from the 2007-2008 and 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey completed a 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire and reported that the quantity of food they ate was reflective of their usual daily diet. EXPOSURES: Daily apple eaters (consuming the equivalent of at least 1 small apple daily, or 149 g of raw apple) vs non-apple eaters, based on the reported quantity of whole apple consumed during the 24-hour dietary recall period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was success at "keeping the doctor away," measured as no more than 1 visit (self-reported) to a physician during the past year; secondary outcomes included successful avoidance of other health care services (ie, no overnight hospital stays, visits to a mental health professional, or prescription medications).

resultsOf 8399 eligible study participants who completed the dietary recall questionnaire, we identified 753 adult apple eaters (9.0%)--those who typically consume at least 1 small apple per day. Compared with the 7646 non-apple eaters (91.0%), apple eaters had higher educational attainment, were more likely to be from a racial or ethnic minority, and were less likely to smoke (P<.001 for each comparison). Apple eaters were more likely, in the crude analysis, to keep the doctor (and prescription medications) away: 39.0% of apple eaters avoided physician visits vs 33.9% of non-apple eaters (P=.03). After adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics, however, the association was no longer statistically significant (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.53; P=.15). In the adjusted analysis, apple eaters also remained marginally more successful at avoiding prescription medications (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.63). There were no differences seen in overnight hospital stay or mental health visits. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Evidence does not support that an apple a day keeps the doctor away; however, the small fraction of US adults who eat an apple a day do appear to use fewer prescription medications.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMalusAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyDrug PrescriptionsEatingFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysOffice VisitsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID25822137
PMCPMC4420713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.