Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822066›Full record

RevieweLife2015

C. elegans outside the Petri dish.

Lise Frézal, Marie-Anne Félix

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 270 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Navigating theNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Global genomic diversity of the selfing nematodebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The bacteria of a fig community.Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lise FrézalInstitute of Biology of Ecole Normale Supérieure, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France.
Marie-Anne FélixInstitute of Biology of Ecole Normale Supérieure, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans has risen to the status of a top model organism for biological research in the last fifty years. Among laboratory animals, this tiny nematode is one of the simplest and easiest organisms to handle. And its life outside the laboratory is beginning to be unveiled. Like other model organisms, C. elegans has a boom-and-bust lifestyle. It feasts on ephemeral bacterial blooms in decomposing fruits and stems. After resource depletion, its young larvae enter a migratory diapause stage, called the dauer. Organisms known to be associated with C. elegans include migration vectors (such as snails, slugs and isopods) and pathogens (such as microsporidia, fungi, bacteria and viruses). By deepening our understanding of the natural history of C. elegans, we establish a broader context and improved tools for studying its biology.

Indexed as

EcosystemLife Cycle StagesAnimalsCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansFemaleHumansMalePhylogenyPopulation DynamicsC. elegansecologyevolutionevolutionary biologygenomicsnatural historythe natural history of model organisms

Identifiers

PMID25822066
PMCPMC4373675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.