Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25822054›Full record

SynthesisHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2015

Reducing youth screen time: qualitative metasynthesis of findings on barriers and facilitators.

Karl E Minges, Neville Owen, Jo Salmon, Ariana Chao, David W Dunstan, Robin Whittemore

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Activity-related behavior typologies in youth: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karl E MingesSchool of Nursing, Yale University.
Neville OwenBehavioural Epidemiology Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute.
Jo SalmonSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University.
Ariana ChaoSchool of Nursing, Yale University.
David W DunstanPhysical Activity Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute.
Robin WhittemoreSchool of Nursing, Yale University.

Funding

Research Training: Self and Family ManagementT32NR008346 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GREY, MARGARET · 2003 to 2018
$4.7M
Multidisciplinary Behavioral Research Training in T1DT32DK097718 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GREY, MARGARET, WEINZIMER, STUART ALAN · 2012 to 2017
$771k
NIDDK NIH HHS T32-DK07718NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK097718NINR NIH HHS T32 NR008346NINR NIH HHS T32-NR008346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAn integrated perspective on the relevant qualitative findings on the experience of screen time in youth can inform the development of hypotheses to be tested in future research and can guide the development of interventions to decrease sedentary behavior. The purpose of this qualitative metasynthesis was to explore parent, youth, and educational professionals' perceptions of barriers to, and facilitators of, reducing youth screen time.

methodQualitative metasynthesis techniques were used to analyze and synthesize 15 qualitative studies of screen time among youth (11-18 years) meeting inclusion criteria. The phrases, quotes, and/or author interpretations (i.e., theme or subtheme) were recorded in a data display matrix to facilitate article comparisons. Codes were collapsed into 23 categories of similar conceptual meaning and 3 overarching themes were derived using thematic analysis procedures.

resultsStudy sample sizes ranged from 6 to 270 participants from 6 countries. Data collection methods included focus groups (n = 6), interviews (n = 4), focus group and interviews (n = 4), and naturalistic observation (n = 1) with youth and/or parents. Data analysis techniques included thematic analysis (n = 9), content analysis (n = 3), grounded theory (n = 1), observation (n = 1), and interpretive phenomenological analysis (n = 1). Three thematic categories were identified: (a) youth's norms-screen time is an integral part of daily life, and facilitates opportunities for entertainment, social interaction, and escapism; (b) family dynamics and parental roles-parents are conflicted and send mixed messages about the appropriate uses and amounts of screen time; and, (c) resources and environment-engagement in screen time is dependent on school, community, neighborhood, and home environmental contexts.

conclusionsScreen time is an established norm in many youth cultures, presenting barriers to behavior change. Parents recognize the importance of reducing youth screen time, but model and promote engagement themselves. For youth and parents, mutually agreed rules, limits, and parental monitoring of screen time were perceived as likely to be effective.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorQualitative ResearchSedentary BehaviorTelevisionAdolescentAge FactorsChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicParentsVideo Games

Identifiers

PMID25822054
PMCPMC4456186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.